| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, May 25, 2002
Posted
5/25/2002 08:00:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/25/2002 07:46:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
I love the fact that the main villain was also the simpering shoe salesman in the ZZTop video, “She’s Got Legs.” I like the fact that the Captain has a dog. I like the fact that show has figured out very quickly who the good characters are, and shunted the lesser ones off the stage. I liked the fact that the EU Council de Science - sorry, the Vulcan Science Council - had decided that time travel was impossible, when we all know that the Federation figured out otherwise a few years later that it wasn’t. (Of course, the Vulcan Science Council knows better, but they keep things from the simplisme Earthlings.) I liked the special effects because I am, at heart, 12 years old, and a dork drawing Enterprise pictures in my notebook unaware of the KICK ME sign on my butt.I thought it was pretty good as well, although our local UPN affiliate ran it with a "viewer's choice" episode (apparently determined via Internet vote), which was just dreadful--a group of renegade Vulcans trying to get in touch with their inner emotions. Long, droning and very painful, it made "the space hippies" episode of the original Trek look good in comparison. Still, the first season of Enterprise has had fewer cringe-inducing moments for a first season of Trek than any series since the first one. And after the pedantic Voyager, I never thought I'd be saying that.
Posted
5/25/2002 05:19:10 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/25/2002 04:13:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/25/2002 12:06:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Is it just me, or is this very odd? From the NYT announcement that Rick Berke is the new Washington editor: "[A]s editor of the high school newspaper, he and a co-author wrote an article disclosing that in 1959, Richard M. Nixon, then vice president, was exposed to microwave radiation beamed at the United States Embassy in Moscow when he was staying there for the 'kitchen debates' with Nikita S. Khrushchev." And the point of that high school article was what exactly? (NYT piece via Andrew Sullivan.)See kids, mom was right--never run the microwave with the door open... Friday, May 24, 2002
Posted
5/24/2002 03:39:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/24/2002 03:18:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/24/2002 03:12:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, May 23, 2002
Posted
5/23/2002 08:49:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 06:51:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 06:46:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 04:56:18 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 04:26:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 04:13:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 04:01:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 03:47:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 03:32:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 03:28:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 03:17:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 02:56:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 02:32:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 01:18:14 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 10:28:59 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 10:06:53 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 09:48:28 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 09:34:32 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 09:20:37 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/23/2002 09:10:52 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Stop the presses! Or the electrons, or whatever. Mexican-American households earn 40 percent less than non-Hispanic whites because they're less educated, says a Public Policy Institute of California report. What's interesting is that more education leads to more earnings for second-generation Mexican-Americans, but not for the third generation, which has even more access to schooling.As to what, stop by her site, where Joanne does a great job of exposing what's keeping kids from succeeding.Immigration experts and community groups say Mexican-American children often must attend schools that lack up-to-date textbooks, credentialed teachers and access to computers, hampering the group from improving its lot as quickly as previous waves of immigrants.Did the second generation get better schools than the third? I don't think so. Something else is going on here that has more to do with culture than number of computers in school. Wednesday, May 22, 2002
Posted
5/22/2002 05:22:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/22/2002 12:26:15 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/22/2002 12:08:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
An Associated Press story this morning reports that Jeb Bush and his cabinet have decided to end a particularly ugly state policy. In order to get into a public school’s “gifted and talented” program, you had to pass an IQ test—but the passing grade was lower if you were black than if you were white. Rather insulting, wouldn’t you say, even if done for the greater good of “diversity”? The change in policy was prompted, it seems safe to say, by a lawsuit filed with the backing of Ward Connerly’s American Civil Rights Institute and an aggressive series of letters sent this year by ACRI and the Center for Equal Opportunity to a number of Florida school districts. The letter—now posted on CEO’s website, www.ceousa.org—informed the school districts of the lawsuit and their districts’ legal vulnerability if they didn’t stop discriminating.
Posted
5/22/2002 10:09:02 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/22/2002 09:42:58 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Arab consumers may not be willing to make this kind of sacrifice. They may forgo Western goods where there are Arab alternatives, but not give up consumption altogether. And in the final analysis, does it really make a difference from a globalization standpoint if the pizza being consumed in Doha has an American or a Qatari name? It is still pizza. A burger is a burger, whether or not it is a Saudi Burger. The Arab reactionaries cannot stop the westernizing of their culture simply by switching to domestic knockoffs of Western goods; in fact, that tactic marks their surrender to it.
Posted
5/22/2002 09:27:07 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/22/2002 09:23:18 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/22/2002 12:13:15 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, May 21, 2002
Posted
5/21/2002 10:48:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 10:34:48 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 10:29:08 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 10:05:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 09:30:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 03:12:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 02:28:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 02:15:10 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 01:47:36 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 01:44:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 01:35:25 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 01:01:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 09:45:23 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 09:41:15 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 09:35:20 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Is the administration serious about counterterrorism in the skies? It would seem not. Speaking to the Senate today, Under-secretary of commerce John Magaw has testified that the White House will continue to oppose arming pilots. Add this stance to the continued presence of Norm Mineta in government, and air travelers have every reason to be concerned that the White House's attitude to their safety is a combination of the frivolous, the foolish and the feeble. When it comes to flight security, the Bush administration seems to put PC over protection and bureaucracy over imagination. What a disgrace.I can understand the Bush administration's fear of giving a Second Amendment issue to their opponents (especially when read hysterical quips like the one at the top of this page). But Stuffaford is right.
Posted
5/21/2002 09:04:16 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 08:56:37 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 08:39:26 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 08:32:53 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 08:19:41 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 08:08:36 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 08:03:17 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 12:33:14 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/21/2002 12:17:43 AM
by Edward Driscoll
In Bournemouth, Great Britain, unsavory speech is dealt with strictly. Ask street preacher Harry Hammond. After denouncing homosexuality from his curbside pulpit, a crowd gathered around him and began to pelt him with dirt and water. He was then fined £300 for “trying to incite people to attack homosexuals.” Finally, the magistrates ordered that his placard -- “Stop Immorality, Stop Homosexuality” -- be destroyed.Why do I get the feeling that this sounds more like Portmeirion than Bournemouth? Monday, May 20, 2002
Posted
5/20/2002 11:09:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/20/2002 10:20:16 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/20/2002 09:59:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/20/2002 09:53:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/20/2002 09:51:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/20/2002 08:47:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Without lifting the travel ban or trade embargo, Bush is attempting to infiltrate Castro's island prison with humanitarian assistance and democratic values in an approach dubbed by a senior State Department official as a "frontal assault against Castro." The basic thrust is that the U.S. will attempt to make an end-run around Castro to both engage the Cuban people and sow the seeds of democracy.If Bush plays his cards right, he could have the most effective foreign policy since Reagan. The Gipper brought down the Soviet Union. Assuming Dubya gets reelected, by the end of his second term he may very well have not only reshaped the Middle East, but liberated Cuba from its tyrannical dictator. Not too shabby, if he pulls it off--and if he does, what an astonishing first decade of a new millennium this will be for this nation. UPDATE: Speaking of geopolitics, the Times of London says "On the eve of his six-day trip to Russia and Western Europe, the White House said that he would use his visit to Berlin, where he is due to make a keynote address to the Reichstag, to urge backing for the removal of the Iraqi dictator and his weapons of mass destruction."
Posted
5/20/2002 04:51:36 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/20/2002 04:40:14 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/20/2002 01:30:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, May 19, 2002
Posted
5/19/2002 09:03:08 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/19/2002 05:12:18 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/19/2002 05:06:40 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
5/19/2002 11:02:24 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |