| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, July 13, 2002
Posted
7/13/2002 11:16:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/13/2002 09:49:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/13/2002 09:44:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/13/2002 09:40:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/13/2002 09:33:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/13/2002 08:44:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
By all accounts China's longest-serving political prisoner, Jigme Sangpo, a primary-school teacher, was first sentenced to three years of "re-education through labour" in 1965, according to the London-based Tibet Information Network, a monitoring group. It cited "reliable reports" as indicating that he also served a 10-year sentence from 1970-1980 for political activities. Jigme Sangpo was arrested again in September 1983 and sentenced to 15 years in prison on charges of "counterrevolutionary incitement and propaganda" for campaigning against Chinese rule in Tibet, according to Kamm. His sentence was extended twice after that and had been due to expire on Sept. 3, 2011, when he would be in his mid-80s. Prison authorities exempted him from physical labor several years ago because of his age, Kamm said.
Posted
7/13/2002 08:42:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/13/2002 05:12:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/13/2002 04:24:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
![]()
Posted
7/13/2002 11:22:05 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Friday, July 12, 2002
Posted
7/12/2002 02:04:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/12/2002 01:33:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/12/2002 01:25:46 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, July 11, 2002
Posted
7/11/2002 11:49:50 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/11/2002 09:51:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/11/2002 06:43:07 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/11/2002 06:34:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/11/2002 06:24:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/11/2002 03:22:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/11/2002 02:30:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/11/2002 01:11:23 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/11/2002 01:07:57 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/11/2002 12:58:09 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, July 10, 2002
Posted
7/10/2002 11:35:25 PM
by Edward Driscoll
![]() Dear Concerned and Responsible members of the Blogosphere, I am calling on you to use the power of the Blogosphere, such as it may be, to start a totally inaccurate, completely unsubstantiated, and just plain made up out of thin air, rumor. Why, you may ask, am I asking responsible people to do this? Well, it is for a good cause. And if you hear me out, I think you’ll agree. I have come up with a way to stop young men (and it is mostly younger men who do this) from playing their car stereos with the subwoofers turned all the way up. I would like to start the rumor that the vibration caused by sitting in a confined space, like a car, with the subwoofer blaring, causes, after a period of time, sudden and irreparable impotence in men. There is one thing that everyone young man wants more than having the loudest subwoofer on the block. So, as they say – “when you have them by the balls, their hearts and minds follow.” The fear of impotence is strong enough that even an unsubstantiated rumor that these vibrations might cause it is enough to start a trend of behavior modification. In fact, the terror of failing hydraulics may be so great that this rumor might even become a self-fulfilling prophesy, which could be very amusing to think about. After all, impotence is one of those things that can be caused by worrying about getting it. I know you are all thinking…. but what can I do? I agree overactive subwoofers are a blight on my neighborhood. But no one who rides around with their subwoofer turned all the way up reads my weblog. Well, that’s where the challenge is. Think of it as an experiment in the power of the Blog – how do you reach the unwashed masses? And while you’re at it, how do you explain the difference between sterility and impotence? My guess is that there is at least some minimal crossover between the Blogosphere and SubwooferWorld, and that if you will all just put your blogging noses to the grindstone, and your blogging shoulders to the wheel, that collectively we can start this rumor and give it legs. To jump start things, I have created a modest license place holder that says, simply “subwoofers cause impotence.” They can be purchased at the Stop Road Noise Store at Cafe Press. The rest I leave to you. Won't you please help? A little mention in your Blog could bring so much peace and quiet to your neighborhood.(I can't believe I let her talk me into posting this. Say, I wonder if the French Foreign Legion will accept humiliated ex-bloggers...)
Posted
7/10/2002 05:36:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 03:04:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The first Jackson, the Rev. Jesse Jackson spoke at the 93rd annual meeting of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People this week. He called President Bush and Attorney General John Ashcroft "the most threatening combination" to civil rights in his lifetime. Now, Jackson was born in 1941. In the last 61 years we've seen some daunting combinations: Hitler and Tojo, Captain and Tennille, Darth Vader and the Emperor - oh wait, that Star Wars stuff happened a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away, long before Jackson was born. I know, I know: I'm deliberately misinterpreting Jackson's point. He was talking about African-Americans and the threats they face here at home. But, you know what? That assertion is batty too. George Wallace and J. Edgar Hoover formed a pretty daunting combo. So did Bull Connor and his dogs. Meanwhile, the tag team of Bush and Ashcroft have done exactly nothing to threaten African-Americans - unless of course you think fighting terrorism, appointing blacks to the highest levels of government and letting Ted Kennedy write the administration's education policy is somehow the same thing as siccing German shepherds on black kids in Selma.In the words of the immortal Gary Cooper, yup.
Posted
7/10/2002 02:53:21 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Despite the strong House support, prospects in the Senate were not good for the legislation. Besides the White House, those opposing it include Ernest Hollings, a South Carolina Democrat who heads the Senate Commerce Committee.
Posted
7/10/2002 02:44:04 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 02:07:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 01:51:15 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 10:52:31 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 10:50:05 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 09:46:19 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 09:07:11 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 09:03:07 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 02:14:16 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 12:53:23 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/10/2002 12:45:22 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, July 09, 2002
Posted
7/9/2002 10:31:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/9/2002 10:27:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/9/2002 04:51:30 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The couple is requesting "their family's privacy be respected at this time" and refused to divulge any further details, including whether a divorce was in the works or who would retain custody of their 11-year-old son, Wolfgang. The two tied the knot on April 11, 1981, when both were at the height of their popularity--she the cute youngest daughter Barbara Cooper on One Day at a Time, he the guitar whiz behind one of rock's most popular bands. And, pretty much ever since, tabloids have been writing the post-mortem on the Van Halen-Bertinelli union.
Posted
7/9/2002 02:18:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/9/2002 01:52:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/9/2002 01:12:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/9/2002 11:25:42 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/9/2002 11:21:41 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/9/2002 10:50:50 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/9/2002 01:32:20 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/9/2002 01:13:48 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/9/2002 01:05:40 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Monday, July 08, 2002
Posted
7/8/2002 10:56:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/8/2002 10:51:32 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/8/2002 10:19:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/8/2002 03:34:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
![]()
Posted
7/8/2002 12:34:38 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/8/2002 12:16:38 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/8/2002 12:13:26 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, July 07, 2002
Posted
7/7/2002 07:51:40 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/7/2002 06:54:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/7/2002 06:43:53 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/7/2002 04:23:56 PM
by Edward Driscoll
I am utterly convinced that, in order for the US to lead a successful fight against terror, there is one question they must ask themselves, and fully understand the answer to: Do they understand why some people/nations/groups might hate them so much that they want to carry out attacks like that of September 11th? In my experience (both personal and by watching their media coverage of it), many Americans don't even think of that as a valid question, and certainly not one they should be considering.I think reading about this fellow, as well as the father of much of this insanity, Sayyid Qutb (bin Laden's original inspiration--read the article linked to by my post) answers a number of questions about why they hate us. The real question is, what do we do about it? Sure, we can invade Iraq and other large swatches of the Middle East, and know that we have a 99.9% chance of either winning, or turning whichever country we invade into what one reporter once described as "a self-lighting parking lot" (which of course, is victory, only far messier.) But assuming we don't rely on the latter option, then what? Do we really have the nerve (and we'll need a lot of it) to commit to the same scale of political re-education that we applied to the belligerent nations of Japan and Germany after World War II? Because otherwise, all we've done is achieve a temporary victory. A good one--one that benefits the people of whichever country or countries we liberate, but a temporary victory nonetheless. Was it the Powell Doctrine which said don't attack without having an exit plan? I hope Bush has one in mind, otherwise, our war on terror will be one of those "wars on" wars that never ends. UPDATE: While I was writing this, Sgt. Stryker has also responded to Group Captain Mandrake's response to his original post. (Sgt. Rock and General Ripper remain sadly unresponsive, however.)
Posted
7/7/2002 03:56:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/7/2002 12:47:10 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Mona Baker, a professor at the University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology (UMIST), admitted yesterday that she had dismissed Dr Miriam Shlesinger and Prof Gideon Toury because of their nationality. Despite a storm of complaints raised by her action, Prof Baker stood by her decision, telling The Telegraph: "I deplore the Israeli state. Miriam knew that was how I felt and that they would have to go because of the current situation." Prof Baker asked Dr Shlesinger and Prof Toury to resign from the boards of two academic journals she owns, after signing a website petition last month calling for academics to boycott Israel. When they refused to resign she sacked them.UPDATE: InstaPundit links to some good material related to this story, which in turn leads to this quote from Martin Luther King, Jr. Way to go, MLK!
Home |