| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Friday, July 19, 2002
Posted
7/19/2002 05:03:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/19/2002 04:29:49 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/19/2002 12:44:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
At the moment, she is without a boyfriend; curiously, her last beau happened to be a Muslim. "The relationship was complicated by his interest in committing jihad," she jokes. "I took away his box cutters. At first, I thought he was a terrorist. I just kept on running into this handsome Muslim on the street. He was a fan of mine." So was he stalking her? "He was, but he was a good-looking stalker. I'd been so looking for one of those."UPDATE: Here's Coulter's take on Phyllis Schlafly, who received as many brickbats in the 1970s as Coulter gets today. (See also Orrin Judd's thoughts on Schlafly, complete with hyperlinks to her books and his reviews of them.)
Posted
7/19/2002 12:34:53 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/19/2002 11:45:37 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/19/2002 11:34:33 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Hillary Clinton Shouts Down Senator... Little Rock Library Dogged By Controversy... Tonight's Janet Reno dance party a hot ticket... Gore Leads Polls on '04 Democratic RaceI don't mind the retro-thing, but I don't do Regis ties, OK? UPDATE: Jonah Goldberg has some thoughts on that last headline. If he's right, personally I can't wait to see the '08 model Gore run!
Posted
7/19/2002 11:25:55 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Could you imagine, I asked him, the outrage that would have followed if an official at a Jewish organization had kicked a reporter from an Arab paper out of an event? He apologized, saying he retracted any comment that I may have found threatening. "Sometimes people flare up," he told me, referring to the crowd. "I just wanted to protect us, the council, and you from that." ... Alamoudi may have been inclined to muzzle me because he's "been burned" in the past himself. In 2000, he told a Washington rally that "we are all supporters of Hamas." He added that he supported Hizbollah. Alamoudi says that he supports Hamas for its humanitarian efforts. In 1995 in The Washington Post, however, he defended Hamas leader Abu Marzook as "a moderate man on many issues. If you see him, he is like a child." American authorities deported Marzook to Jordan in 1997 after an American judge found probable cause that he had he had helped plan 10 terrorist attacks against Israeli targets. I wish my run-in with Alamoudi, mentioned in this week's Weekly Standard, was an isolated case. But for all of my good relationships with officials at Arab-American organizations, Arab reporters and Arab diplomats, many members of the "other side" in town won't speak to me. Some Arab reporters in town are unwilling to meet a Jewish reporter, and I've never gotten my calls returned from Saudi, Syrian or Iranian diplomats here.
Posted
7/19/2002 02:20:11 AM
by Edward Driscoll
The subtext of the movie is about being a good parent, a clash between the "good" father (Neeson) and the relentless one (Ford). The faceoffs provide the lead actors with plenty of meat. But because Ford is an executive producer, his bad guy isn't all that bad, ultimately, and he sees to it that he gets the most traffic-stopping speeches, even if his accent is all over the map and the script has him uttering such clunkers as "Men, you have done your duty for the Motherland!"In the late '80s, I remember reading a GQ profile of Ford, where the author said that Ford knows his limitations as an actor, and accents were one of them. Too bad Ford seems to have forgotten that self-limitation: judging by the few minutes of trailers and commercials I've seen for K-19, Ford's Russian accent sounds painfully bad, right up there with Mr. Chekov from Star Trek and Boris from Rocky and Bullwinkle.
Posted
7/19/2002 02:03:41 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/19/2002 01:59:06 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, July 18, 2002
Posted
7/18/2002 10:54:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 10:44:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 10:24:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 05:44:28 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 04:39:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 04:36:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 12:49:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 12:43:18 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 11:51:57 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 11:44:03 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 11:33:02 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 11:23:59 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/18/2002 11:21:56 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, July 17, 2002
Posted
7/17/2002 11:46:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
In a game in December 1993 against the Raiders, Butler forced a fumble by running back Randy Jordan that Reggie White recovered and lumbered with 10 yards before pitching it to Butler, who scored his first career touchdown and celebrated by jumping into the stands. The "Lambeau Leap'' became an entrenched tradition for wide receivers in the years that followed as the Packers went from also-rans to a perennial playoff team, reaching the Super Bowl twice and winning the championship following the 1996 season. Only five players in the club's 83-year history played longer than Butler -- Starr (16 seasons), Ray Nitschke (15), Forrest Gregg (14), and Charles Goldenberg and Dave Hanner (13).
Posted
7/17/2002 11:34:14 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/17/2002 11:19:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
"The last time we faced a hangover like this one, the president didn’t just talk, he acted," writes Newsweek columnist Jonathan Alter. "In 1934 Franklin D. Roosevelt created something called the Securities and Exchange Commission to regulate Wall Street." Alter went on to transcribe DNC’s talking points, dutifully copied by The Wall Street Journal’s house liberal, Al Hunt, and NBC’s Tim Russert, among others, noting that current SEC Commissioner Harvey Pitt was unfit for the job because he "came in talking about a ‘kinder, gentler SEC.’" That Alter would compare 2002 to 1934 indicates that he’s about as grounded in reality as a WorldCom financial statement. The stock market is not the economy. And the economy of 2002 is not the economy of 1934. In 1934, one in five Americans were unemployed -- and one in three for those who didn’t work on farms. The real economy had contracted by 37 percent from 1929 to 1934. Although it’s still disputed, many believe that it wasn’t the stock market crash of 1929 that caused the Depression, but the government’s response to it. A restrictive monetary policy caused banks to fail and businesses, starved for money, tanked in massive numbers. Today, unemployment stands at 5.9 percent. There’s talk of a double-dip recession, but even the first dip is now being disputed. We’ve only actually experienced one quarter of negative economic growth. The stock market hasn’t crashed, as it did in 1929 or even 1987, when it collapsed 22 percent in a single day.I'll never forget the last presidential election, watching Alter's tirade on NBC at about 1:30 in the morning Pacific Time when Alter demanded that Gore be handed the election, despite the outcome in Florida. (When Tom Brokaw and Tim Russert lecture you on the Constitution, as they did to Alter afterwards on the air, you know you're really out there. The Reason article is a very good look at what's right and wrong with the economy today, and as usual, remarkably free of typical journalistic spin.
Posted
7/17/2002 02:59:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
![]()
Posted
7/17/2002 01:49:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/17/2002 11:30:11 AM
by Edward Driscoll
There needs to be either the equivalent of the roaming services that allow a cell phone to be used across the country, or one 802.11 provider needs to step up to be the next AOL or AT&T to provide national, universal coverage. Currently, the typical business user of 802.11 who travels has to have separate accounts and pay for three to five different wireless providers to get anywhere near reasonable coverage while traveling.As I posted yesterday, the New York Times says that a nationwide 802.11 service may be coming, thanks to a coalition including Intel, IBM, AT&T Wireless and several other wireless and Internet service providers including Verizon Communications and Cingular. Smart move!
Posted
7/17/2002 11:27:39 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/17/2002 02:17:29 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, July 16, 2002
Posted
7/16/2002 04:15:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
"I was rushed to Bellevue and had all the tests. My dad's cardiologist came and saw me the next day, and they did echo-cardiograms and all that stuff, and then she went, 'His heart's in great shape. There's no blockage. It's strong. It's a great heart. However, this is the most stressed-out, uptight human being I have ever met in my life. You must immediately get him into meditation.' And my producer said, 'No, no, no, no. He was meditating when he had the heart attack."
Posted
7/16/2002 04:09:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/16/2002 03:27:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
While most of the West, if not the world, is Americanizing for good and for ill, France remains determined to stay French. The beautiful jabbering they call the French language is disappearing like an ornate sandcastle washed over by the global English tide. French officials debate for years over whether words like CD-rom are acceptable cultural imports (It's not. "Cederom" is the accepted form), while the rest of the world increasingly treats France as the Betamax of world history — an interesting alternative, but no less irrelevant for it. This would be touching, save for the fact that France increasingly defines being "French" as disagreeing with the United States. We support Israel, so the French hate Israel (and they really do hate it). McDonald's is American, so noodle-armed French intellectuals flex their wine muscles by tearing apart a few Mickey D's (even as France remains among the biggest consumers of Big Macs in the world). We say the war on terrorism is important, so they say it isn't. We say Osama bin Laden launched the attack on 9/11, and so the number-one bestseller in France says the Pentagon attacked itself. You can see the problem here. If you want a culture which is defined by thinking and doing the opposite of another culture, that's fine. The British played this game with the French and became the pedestal upon which liberty, the rule of law, and the free market rest while France, in the words of Thomas Carlyle, remained simply a long despotism tempered by epigrams.
Posted
7/16/2002 02:11:15 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/16/2002 02:07:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
the corporate scandals might give John McCain an opening here to challenge Bush for the GOP nomination in 2004. Whatever else it did, his campaign finance reform crusade (which I didn't support, on First Amendment grounds) gives him a history of being against "corporate fatcats." If anything, he's more hawkish than Bush on the war, which is the president's strong suit. And the media love him. If the bear market continues over the next year, the country goes into a double-dip recession, and things go awry with Saddam ... whaddaya think? Might Bush have to slay that dragon before taking on the Democrat in the fall?
Posted
7/16/2002 11:14:20 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Frank Lindh said he told his son after he was brought back to the United States that South African leader "Nelson Mandela served 26 years and I told him to be prepared for something like that."
Posted
7/16/2002 11:10:48 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/16/2002 02:37:27 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/16/2002 02:33:18 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/16/2002 02:30:21 AM
by Edward Driscoll
In perhaps the most important decision of its six years in office, the Blair government in Britain has reverted to the old socialist past. It has raised taxes and now it's going to pour billions into public services. No real reforms needed. In a way, it's clarifying. Labour cannot reform public services, cannot privatize them but cannot afford the political cost of their deterioration. So they're back to tax and spend - big time. The danger, of course, is that the services don't improve even then. Then the backlash will be intense and the Tories given another chance. My prediction: the British welfare state will barely exist in its current form in a decade's time.
Posted
7/16/2002 01:34:08 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/16/2002 01:30:48 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/16/2002 01:22:26 AM
by Edward Driscoll
We all know by now that Michael Jackson is mad at Sony Music for apparently not promoting his album, ‘Invincible’ and for reportedly refusing to release his charity single, ‘What More Can I Give.’ But now, according to The Los Angeles Times it was actually Jackson’s advisors and not Sony who put a halt to the release. Jackson’s people apparently wanted the single shelved after learning that the song’s executive producer, F. Marc Schaffel, had ties to the gay pornography industry, specifically directing and producing a number of films. Obviously this new information contradicts what Jackson has been saying all along and can only hurt the ongoing feud he has with Sony. Jackson’s representatives would not comment on the latest developments but did tell The Times that when they, and Jackson, discovered Schaffel’s background, they immediately ended their association with him. Monday, July 15, 2002
Posted
7/15/2002 11:26:04 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The Congressional Budget Office, for example, believed the money supply had nothing whatsoever to do with inflation, and that cutting tax rates would add fuel to it. CBO Director Alice Rivlin said output would fall if tax rates were cut, because workers could work less and still get the same after-tax income. A commonly held view at the time was that it would either take decades to bring inflation down to tolerable levels or another Great Depression. Arthur Okun of the Brookings Institution reflected the views of most economists when he said in 1977 that the economy would shrink by 10 percent for every 1 percent fall in the inflation rate. To his credit, Ronald Reagan rejected the conventional view and supported Kemp-Roth, making it his principal campaign issue in 1980. Jimmy Carter, who endorsed the establishment's thinking, rejected tax cuts as inflationary. He said inflation was just due to a lot of bad luck — oil price increases by Arab countries, bad harvests and the like. Mr. Carter never once took responsibility for inflation's rise from 4.9 percent in Gerald Ford's last year to 13.3 percent in 1979 and 12.5 percent in 1980. Kemp-Roth was considered reckless even by Republicans — George H.W. Bush called it "voodoo economics" and Senate Majority Leader Howard Baker, Tennessee Republican, called it a "riverboat gamble." But Mr. Reagan pressed ahead with a tight money policy at the Fed and a sharp reduction in tax rates in 1981. And as he, Mr. Kemp and Mr. Roth knew would happen, the economy not only recovered, but inflation collapsed to about 4 percent throughout the 1980s. To this day, none of the economists who predicted hyperinflation from the Reagan-Kemp-Roth tax cut have ever acknowledged the gross error of their predictions. They just pretend the whole thing never happened. Yet the 180-degree turnaround in the American economy from the 1970s to the 1980s took place and cannot be denied. Without Jack Kemp and Bill Roth, it might not have happened.For more on Kemp-Roth, and the supply-siders of the 1970s, check out Jude Wanniski's The Way The World Works, or the out-of-print, but worth searching for The Seven Fat Years by former Wall Street Journal editor Robert Bartley.
Posted
7/15/2002 10:06:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/15/2002 06:56:48 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/15/2002 11:41:10 AM
by Edward Driscoll
For those who still hold to the longer-term view of personal finance, which is the key to successful investing, today's market averages look to be nearly 40% undervalued. For those policy makers among you, a 4% economy could be turned into a 6% economy over the next few years if the government would reliquify the gold price to $350 (or even $400), eliminate the double taxation of dividends, lower the capital gains tax, and accelerate planned income-tax cuts. Add to that the elimination of the steel tariff and a once-and-for-all dead Osama bin Laden, and we'll be sitting pretty. For those of you who have faith, now's the time to rely on it. Faith defeats the forces of darkness. Faith brings on the forces of good. The stock market has survived tough runs before, and it will do so again.
Posted
7/15/2002 11:28:12 AM
by Edward Driscoll
A national advertising campaign designed to attract a team of leading education advisers to Manchester, England, to improve the city's schools contained no less than 21 mistakes. One paragraph included the phrase: "If you think you have what it takes to make a significant and lasting impression to Education attainment in one of the Country's most dynamic and forwarding looking authorities...."
Posted
7/15/2002 10:51:01 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/15/2002 10:35:32 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, July 14, 2002
Posted
7/14/2002 11:49:56 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 11:33:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 10:53:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 10:27:51 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 06:27:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 06:16:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 02:00:18 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 01:13:46 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 01:10:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 01:04:32 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 01:03:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 01:03:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 01:01:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
7/14/2002 01:00:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Mitchell Crooks moved to LA three years ago to make his fortune as a rave deejay, but ended up occasionally homeless and desperate...After taping the Donovan Jackson head-slam, Crooks sold copies of the video to TV stations for $150 a pop. He’s also a political nut: The Times describes him as a "a Green Party supporter who adores Ralph Nader and hates President Bush"; Hanna said Crooks wouldn’t give CBS a copy because the network "blew" the 2000 presidential election by calling it too early, and told ABC representatives they couldn’t have the tape unless they reinstated Bill Maher’s "Politically Incorrect." His mother Patricia Crooks, who raised Mitchell alone, said his terror of police came from when he had some of his hair yanked out by a guard in juvenile hall.
Posted
7/14/2002 01:00:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |