| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, September 07, 2002
Posted
9/7/2002 06:00:25 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Friday, September 06, 2002
Posted
9/6/2002 01:06:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/6/2002 09:25:29 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/6/2002 08:57:03 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/6/2002 08:55:51 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, September 05, 2002
Posted
9/5/2002 01:09:04 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, September 04, 2002
Posted
9/4/2002 11:56:56 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 11:53:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 10:39:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 09:56:14 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 09:49:36 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 09:40:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
In the middle of an interview with a woman who saw the first plane hit, she gasps Oh My God, another one - and it reminds you again of that moment, the point when you grasped exactly what was happening, and the ground swayed. I’d say it brought it all back but it never went away. There hasn’t been a day I haven’t thought about it. That bothers some people. There’s an attitude in some quarters that there’s something unhealthy about thinking about 9/11, certainly in dwelling on the details. They’ll allow a certain amount of regret and dismay. They’ll permit you a brief spasm of anger, but it had best be followed with a nuanced assessment of American foreign policy. Remark that you had a nightmare about your daughter getting smallpox or a nuke in New York, and they’ll roll their eyes; tut tut the lad’s gone mad. These people are no doubt bracing themselves for the first anniversary, but for different reasons than you might have. They can’t stand people who won’t let go of 9/11. Once they washed the ash off their car it was over for them; why can’t it be over for everyone? Do you really think your inability to move along makes you a better person? Stop waving the bloody shirt. Send it to the cleaners already, and leave Iraq alone.Actually, sometimes anger is the healthiest emotion. And payback extremely cathartic.
Posted
9/4/2002 09:00:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 06:22:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 04:47:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 04:36:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
"The overall feeling," said the source, "was that renewables might be fine for Europeans, but Africans and Asians need to boost their economies by using energy that is inexpensive and abundant." The source was clearly referring to oil and coal, which will provide the vast majority of energy for China and India over the next decade.Glassman calls it "a stunning victory on the contentious issue of energy" for the U.S. Take that, Mayor Moonbeam!
Posted
9/4/2002 02:35:56 PM
by Edward Driscoll
WITH SEPT. 11 APPROACHING, THIS IS WORTH READING AND PASSING ON.... "DO NOT FORGET" I sat in a movie theater watching "Schindler's List," asked myself, "Why didn't the Jews fight back?" Now I know why. I sat in a movie theater, watching "Pearl Harbor" and asked myself, "Why weren't we prepared?" Now I know why. Civilized people cannot fathom, much less predict, the actions of evil people. On September 11, dozens of capable airplane passengers allowed themselves to be overpowered by a handful of poorly armed terrorists because they did not comprehend the depth of hatred that motivated their captors. On September 11, thousands of innocent people were murdered because too many Americans naively reject the reality that some nations are dedicated to the dominance of others. Many political pundits, pacifists and media personnel want us to forget the carnage. They say we must focus on the bravery of the rescuers and ignore the cowardice of the killers. They implore us to understand the motivation of the perpetrators. Major television stations have announced they will assist the healing process by not replaying devastating footage of the planes crashing into the Twin Towers. I will not be manipulated. I will not pretend to understand. I will not forget. I will not forget the liberal media who abused freedom of the press to kick our country when it was vulnerable and hurting. I will not forget that CBS anchor Dan Rather preceded President Bush's address to the nation with the snide remark, "No matter how you feel about him, he is still our president." I will not forget that ABC TV anchor Peter Jennings questioned President Bush's motives for not returning immediately to Washington, DC and commented, "We're all pretty skeptical and cynical about Washington." And I will not forget that ABC's Mark Hampering warned if reporters weren't informed of every little detail of this war, they aren't "likely -- nor should they be expected -- to show deference." I will not isolate myself from my fellow Americans by pretending an attack on the USS Cole in Yemen was not an attack on the United States of America. I will not forget the Clinton administration equipped Islamic terrorists and their supporters with the world's most sophisticated telecommunications equipment and encryption technology, thereby compromising America's ability to trace terrorist radio, cell phone, land lines, faxes and modem communications. I will not be appeased with pointless, quick retaliatory strikes like those perfected by the previous administration. I will not be comforted by "feel-good, do nothing" regulations like the silly "Have your bags been under your control?" question at the airport. I will not be influenced by so called," antiwar demonstrators" who exploit the right of expression to chant anti-American obscenities. I will not forget the moral victory handed the North Vietnamese by American war protesters who reviled and spat upon the returning soldiers, airmen, sailors and Marines. I will not be softened by the wishful thinking of pacifists who chose reassurance over reality. I will embrace the wise words of Prime Minister Tony Blair who told Labor Party conference, "They have no moral inhibition on the slaughter of the innocent. If they could have murdered not 7,000 but 70,000, does anyone doubt they would have done so and rejoiced in it? There is no compromise possible with such people, no meeting of minds, no point of understanding with such terror. Just a choice: defeat it or be defeated by it. And defeat it we must!" I will force myself to: -hear the weeping -feel the helplessness -imagine the terror -sense the panic -smell the burning flesh - experience the loss - remember the hatred. I sat in a movie theater, watching "Private Ryan" and asked myself, "Where did they find the courage?" Now I know. We have no choice. Living without liberty is not living. -- Ed Evans, MGySgt., USMC (Ret.) Not as lean, Not as mean, But still a Marine. Keep this going until every living American has read it and memorized it so we don't make the same mistake again.Fair enough, Sergeant.
Posted
9/4/2002 02:28:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 01:48:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 12:03:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 10:23:09 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 10:19:57 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 01:30:50 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 01:10:39 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/4/2002 12:06:29 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, September 03, 2002
Posted
9/3/2002 09:33:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
[Marum] notes that the ship itself was purchased from a Lebanese seller for $400,000 last October -- after Arafat had made his post-September 11 pledge to fight terror -- by Adel Mughrabi, a senior PA figure close to Arafat. Another Arafat confidant, Fouad Shubaki, chief procurement and finance officer of the PA, handled payment for the weapons. Marum says it is "outrageous" that Shubaki is being held in a PA facility in Jericho. "He ought to be tried in a proper court of law." The shipment filled 80 custom-made submersible containers, which were to be tossed overboard off the Gaza coast and washed ashore or picked up by fishing boats and other small vessels. The haul included 700,000 rounds of small-arms ammunition; 735 hand grenades, 311 anti-personnel mines and 211 anti-tank mines; 345 long- and short-range Katyusha rockets and 10 launchers; 29 mortar tubes and 1,545 shells; six Sagger wire-guided anti-tank missile launchers and 10 missiles; 51 RPG-7 anti-tank missiles and 328 rockets; 30 high-powered Dragonov telescopic rifles; 212 Kalashnikov assault rifles, over 2,000 kilograms of explosives, and two speedboats with powerful Yamaha engines and a range of diving equipment. Much of this weaponry is prohibited from the PA under the Oslo Accords.
Posted
9/3/2002 03:28:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
So was this summit a success? Depends on what you thought it would accomplish. If your goal was to attend and to eat a lot of lobster and caviar and drink a lot of champagne, then it was unequivocally a success. If you wanted to be able to come home and say that there was an agreement, then it's still a success. They'll have an agreement, all right. If you actually wanted the agreement to make any difference, I'd say it wasn't. Expect a rising tide of criticism from the activist groups after the summit is over, as they realize that their grand dreams of actually diverting the world to a new course evaporated like so many lumps of dry ice in the African sunshine. At least they were successful in preventing the Arabs from hijacking the conference and turning it into yet another Israeli slam-fest.
Posted
9/3/2002 03:24:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/3/2002 03:00:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/3/2002 02:50:18 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/3/2002 02:08:46 PM
by Edward Driscoll
A British author critical of the Green movement, Professor Philip Stott, said Brown's anti-development views, as relayed to him, can be likened to Marie Antoinette's reported response when she was told the French peasants had no bread to eat: "Let them eat cake."Because the reporter dared question Brown's rococco environmentalism, he quotes Brown as actually asking him, "Are you with [Lyndon] LaRouche?" Chris Horner of the free market advocacy group, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, was not surprised that Brown would assume that any reporter who challenged modern environmental thinking must be "cult-related." "It shows how little if any critical media presence exists. When non-softball questions are posed, the reporter is immediately presumed to be a conspiracist or cult-related," Horner said.I wonder if Brown was ever asked about the amount of resources wasted by the summit itself?
Posted
9/3/2002 11:35:59 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/3/2002 11:06:47 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/3/2002 10:51:42 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |