| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, October 05, 2002
Posted
10/5/2002 10:53:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Red Dragon's sins are not of commission but omission; not what it does wrong, but what it just plain fails to do. It's resolutely average and, worse, unambitious, so bloody competent that it is in fact bloodless, cleanly avoiding opportunities to take its scenario someplace interesting, frustrating any attempts to get really caught up in it. But those qualities befit a movie that's both a third sequel and a remake; no doubt its focus-group scores were through the roof.
Posted
10/5/2002 09:38:29 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/5/2002 08:44:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/5/2002 07:30:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/5/2002 03:32:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/5/2002 02:50:53 PM
by Edward Driscoll
![]()
Posted
10/5/2002 02:47:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/5/2002 01:14:30 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/5/2002 12:15:22 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Friday, October 04, 2002
Posted
10/4/2002 11:54:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 11:43:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 10:04:51 PM
by Edward Driscoll
There probably was not a delegate present who would not have been primed to laugh at a George Dubya "cowboy" joke. Yet Mr Clinton's most notorious foreign policy action was to launch a flight of cruise missiles into the outskirts of the city of Khartoum, destroying the Al-Shifa pharmaceutical factory on the pretence (now acknowledged to have been false) it was a chemical weapons facility. How could such an atrocity have been committed? Because Mr Clinton did not even demand an inspection, did not consult the UN or Congress, and over-ruled Joint Chiefs of Staff, CIA and State Department.As found on The Greatest Jeneration Blog.
Posted
10/4/2002 06:28:40 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 05:38:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 04:31:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The contention that in America's wars, minorities bear a disproportionate burden of the fighting and dying has long been a staple of Left-wing rhetoric since the Vietnam War. Even as late as the Gulf War in 1991, Jesse Jackson, addressing a largely black audience, claimed that "when that war breaks out, our youth will burn first." But as Will Rogers once said, "it's not the things we don't know that get us into trouble. It's the things we know that just ain't true." The claim of disproportionate minority casualties wasn't true during the Vietnam War, where the record indicates that 86 percent of those who died during the war were white and 12.5 percent were black, from an age group in which blacks comprised 13.1 percent of the population. It is even less true today. To understand why, it is necessary to look a little beneath the surface. While overall, minorities comprise 30 percent of the Army, one of the two services that would be expected to bear the brunt of close combat in Iraq, they tend to be underrepresented in the combat arms. As the incomparable Tom Ricks observed in a January 1997 article for the Wall Street Journal, the "old stereotype about the Army's front-line units being cannon fodder laden with minorities" is false.
Posted
10/4/2002 04:29:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 04:17:51 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 03:00:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 02:32:09 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Jerry Rice, pushing 40, still looks smooth and lithe. Rod Woodson, as hard as Alcatraz looming out in the Bay, is 37. Tim Brown and Rich Gannon, a mere 36, are bristling with vigor. Trace Armstrong and Bill Romanowski, also 36, are looking good, too.Meanwhile however, Sebastian Janikowski, their kicker, has been charged with DUI. Maybe he can carpool with Randy Moss.
Posted
10/4/2002 02:24:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 02:11:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 02:06:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 02:02:46 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 01:50:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
PAGING DR FREUD: "When the Prime Minister spoke yesterday I thought to myself, "I hope I'll be able to give a speech like that when I grow up" - Bill Clinton, at the Labour Party Conference yesterday.
Posted
10/4/2002 01:01:38 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 12:37:13 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/4/2002 12:26:25 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, October 03, 2002
Posted
10/3/2002 07:56:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 07:38:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 04:26:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The Associated Press has a photo of a North Korean propaganda poster, which shows three red missiles heading toward a crumbling U.S. Capitol Building, with a tattered American flag in the foreground. The AP translates the poster's text: ''If someone starts an invasion war, we will crush the U.S. bastards first.''As found on the Wall Street Journal's Best of the Web Today.
Posted
10/3/2002 03:48:46 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 01:35:51 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 01:02:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The Vietnam era divided the nation but not as severely as it divided the Democratic Party. The party of Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman and John F. Kennedy still seems incapable, more than 25 years after the war's end, of collectively addressing America's defense posture in coherent and creative ways. Instead, once again, Democrats are responding to a Republican president as individual entrepreneurs trying to protect themselves against the traditional conservative charge of being "soft on defense." For proof of Democratic marginalization on these issues, one need look no further than the polls that consistently show Americans trust Republicans more than Democrats to manage foreign policy and conflict. Though the commitment to national defense should be above partisan advantage, how that commitment is carried out will always divide the parties. If the president is successful in convincing the American people that Iraq is an immediate threat to our security, and the Democrats are simply in opposition, this issue could well decide the Congressional balance of power, propelling Republicans to victory in both the House and the Senate in the upcoming midterm elections.Well worth reading the whole thing.
Posted
10/3/2002 12:57:56 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 12:55:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 12:53:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 12:31:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 11:10:30 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 11:02:12 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Think about it. Who would be a better judge of what really is, and isn't, pass interference than Green? Or who could determine holding better than a veteran lineman such as Bruce Smith?
Posted
10/3/2002 10:58:10 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 10:54:39 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/3/2002 10:29:44 AM
by Edward Driscoll
It was simple evolution: All whites - and Jews especially - should be murdered; then all Negroes who did not submit to his agenda; then all homosexuals; then all capitalists; then all who did not agree that the Western world and capitalism should be destroyed. True, Jones began his career more than 40 years ago as a very talented Greenwich Village poet, essayist, playwright and novelist, a black bohemian with a Jewish wife and two children. But that LeRoi flipped out inthe late '60s, left his wife and children after deciding to become a racist black leader and sold out his talent in the interest of hysterical diatribes that have gotten neither worse nor better in the past 35 years. Consistency is all. For those who would celebrate his writing, there is only one question. What good book has he written since 1965? What truly good poem? Or does one become a member of the American Academy of Arts and Letters and poet laureate of New Jersey just by staying alive?Michelle Malkin also has some thoughts.
Posted
10/3/2002 12:54:01 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, October 02, 2002
Posted
10/2/2002 11:54:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 11:10:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 10:49:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 10:44:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 09:30:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 09:06:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 08:51:29 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 08:48:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 08:37:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 03:38:48 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 02:57:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 02:49:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 02:10:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 02:04:29 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 12:38:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 12:36:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 12:20:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
it's a checklist, not an on/off switch. And in the end that's the response to all of these alleged silver-bullet antiwar arguments. No one argument is sufficient, pro or con. You need to look at a long list of criteria and make a decision. Some pro-war arguments are very strong, some less so. But you have to add them all up together and look at the final tally. So: Is Iraq a brutal totalitarian regime? Check! Is it a proven threat to its neighbors? Check! Is it a proven threat to its own people? Check! Is it a proven threat to our allies? Check! Is it willing to export terrorism abroad? Check! Is it likely that if it got weapons of mass destruction, it would use them recklessly? Check! Is it working very hard to get weapons of mass destruction? Check! Would Saddam's people be better off without him? Check! Would we and our allies be better off without him? Check! Do we have the power and capabilities to get rid of him without paying too high a cost? Check! And, would getting rid of him make it less likely that another September 11 would "happen again"? Check.
Posted
10/2/2002 01:27:12 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/2/2002 01:23:55 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, October 01, 2002
Posted
10/1/2002 09:51:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/1/2002 09:42:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/1/2002 04:11:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/1/2002 03:35:51 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/1/2002 03:31:40 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/1/2002 03:13:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/1/2002 02:41:46 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Even Al Gore would likely have come up with more interesting attempts at songwriting than this.Ouch. I haven't bought The Rising yet, and I don't know if I will, simply because Bruce basically lost me as a listener right around the time of Tunnel of Love. But all of his 1970s albums are certainly worth checking out (as if you didn't own them already).
Posted
10/1/2002 01:56:53 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/1/2002 01:34:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
There is no other word for it. The Torch's vanishing act was only the latest piece of bad news for a party that ought to be sitting very pretty with only 36 days to go before a midterm election.Podhoretz adds, Over the past week, a powerful image of the Democratic Party has begun to be fixed in the American mind. We all watched as Al Gore, Tom Daschle and Ted Kennedy waged a friendly competition about who could be more critical of a popular president when it came to that popular president's foreign policy and handling of the war on terrorism. This is not where the Democrats should be five weeks before the November elections. They're not all unethical, and they're not anti-war for the most part. But that's politics for you.It's a great article. Go check it out.
Posted
10/1/2002 01:30:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/1/2002 12:29:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/1/2002 12:21:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
I can't remember where I read it or even who said it, but an old story keeps popping into my head. A former leftist-turned-conservative (from the old Partisan Review crowd, I think) encounters an unreconstructed lefty at a party. The lefty starts spouting all kinds of silliness about capitalist robber barons or American imperialism or some such. The conservative responds, "Your arguments are so old, I've forgotten the answer to them."
Posted
10/1/2002 09:47:32 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Almost exactly a year ago, on Oct. 3, 2001, a passenger on a Greyhound bus in Tennessee cut the driver's throat, causing a crash that killed seven. Two weeks later, passengers on another Greyhound bus were credited with averting disaster in Utah after they helped thwart an alleged hijacker. And in November, a Greyhound passenger angry that he wasn't allowed to smoke scuffled with a driver in Arizona, causing a crash that injured 33.Given the current environment, I'd have no problem with Greyhound drivers getting very rough with out-of-control passengers. Armed bus drivers? Makes sense to me. Monday, September 30, 2002
Posted
9/30/2002 09:09:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 09:07:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 05:54:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 05:50:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 05:46:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 05:35:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Even before Torricelli announced his withdrawal Monday at a news conference in Trenton, N.J., GOP officials said they were ready to go to court to block Democrats from fielding a replacement candidate so close to the election. "The laws of the state of New Jersey do not contain a 'we think we're going to lose so we get to pick someone new' clause," taunted Torricelli's challenger, Doug Forrester. On a practical level, Democratic party officials have yet to settle on a consensus choice to take Torricelli's place on the ballot. Even assuming an agreement by Tuesday on Rep. Bob Menendez or another replacement, they will have only five weeks to shed the ill-effects of Torricelli's ethics woes, introduce their candidate to the voters around the state and rough up Forrester on the issues.UPDATE: Orrin Judd has more.
Posted
9/30/2002 04:56:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 04:50:48 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 04:03:50 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 04:02:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 11:09:59 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 10:33:10 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
9/30/2002 10:30:45 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |