| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Thursday, October 10, 2002
Posted
10/10/2002 03:38:16 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/10/2002 03:31:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/10/2002 02:56:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Ward said the man was in his mid-20s and had recently come to Santa Cruz. He was homeless before deciding to join a tree-sit protest against Redwood Empire, Ward said, the San Jose-based firm now logging the approximately 50-acre site.Does this mean that's he was no longer homeless since he found a tree to sit on? Since when did a tree, on land you don't own, count as a legal residence? UPDATE: H.D. Miller says that the Redwood Empire protester is nowhere near the record for a protester falling from a tree, and suggests that this could be a new category in the Darwin Awards. Someone should update the Monty Python "People Falling from Buildings" sketch to reflect this new competitive sport.
Posted
10/10/2002 11:24:39 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/10/2002 10:49:08 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/10/2002 10:45:06 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/10/2002 10:39:51 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/10/2002 02:42:06 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, October 09, 2002
Posted
10/9/2002 11:56:15 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The shooting occurred about 8:15 p.m. Over 100 law enforcement officials were scouring the area for clues, Deane said. Authorities blocked off several streets around the gas station and interviewed witnesses. "At this point, we cannot say if this case is related to those shootings," Deane said at a news conference early Thursday. Maryland investigators went to the scene of the killing because of similarities with the previous shootings, according to Montgomery County Executive Douglas Duncan. "Everything is very similar," he said, adding: "Let's hope this is not it."What does "Let's hope this is not it" mean? Does this mean that Duncan wants there to be a second shooter? Wouldn't that just compound his problems? Or did the reporter mistype his quote--or am I misreading it?
Posted
10/9/2002 05:29:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Consider two aspects of globalization: first, planes exploding as they slam into the World Trade Center, and second, the emission of carbon dioxide from the exhaust of gas-guzzling sport-utility vehicles. One brought instant death and left unforgettable images that were watched on television screens all over the world; the other makes a contribution to climate change that can be detected only by scientific instruments. Yet both are indications of the way in which we are now one world, and the more subtle changes to which sport-utility-vehicle owners unintentionally contribute will almost certainly kill far more people than the more visible aspect of globalization.Of course, it's tough to take seriously someone (unless you have to write your kid's tuition checks) who think it's OK to get frisky (yes--that kind of frisky) with Fido. (Link found the Wall Street Journal's "Best of the Web" column)
Posted
10/9/2002 04:54:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 03:54:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 03:35:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 03:26:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Even to the untrained eye, it is easy to see why many of the visas should have been denied. Consider, for example, the U.S. destinations most of them listed. Only one of the 15 provided an actual address — and that was only because his first application was refused — and the rest listed only general locations — including "California," "New York," "Hotel D.C.," and "Hotel." One terrorist amazingly listed his U.S. destination as simply "No." Even more amazingly, he got a visa.Hard to believe that such incompetence is possible at a federal agency. Wait a second--no it's not.
Posted
10/9/2002 03:12:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
President Bush has been Reagan-like in his prosecution of the war on terror. But he has a long way to go on the economy if he is to meet the Gipper's domestic-leadership test. More than likely, it is the Bush economic team that is not developing the necessary pro-growth formula. There are some bright heads in the group, but they are offset by the meatheads. No good deed goes unpunished in this gang. But economic victory can still be rescued from the jaws of defeat. Rumors abound that the White House is now engaged in a job search to completely revamp its economic team. Market-savvy New Yorkers like Blackstone's Steve Schwartzman and the New York Stock Exchange's Richard Grasso might be on the list to replace the ineffective Paul O'Neill at Treasury. There are also some welcome plans for the post-Greenspan era at the Fed. With new leadership blood in place, a vigorous effort to bring significant growth back to this economy can begin.
Posted
10/9/2002 01:49:51 PM
by Edward Driscoll
To put it bluntly, the owner of the property should be able to determine — for good reasons, bad reasons, or no reason at all — whether to admit smokers, nonsmokers, neither, or both. Customers or employees who object may go elsewhere. They would not be relinquishing any right that they ever possessed. By contrast, when a businessman is forced to effect an unwanted smoking policy on his own property, the government violates his rights. That's the controlling principle. Private property does not belong to the public. Employing a large staff, or providing services to lots of people, is not sufficient to transform private property into public property. The litmus test for private property is ownership, not the size of the customer base or the workforce.
Posted
10/9/2002 01:44:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 01:30:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 01:26:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 12:11:28 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 12:06:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 11:32:36 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 01:58:43 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 01:45:45 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/9/2002 12:17:53 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Recently I saw the strangest documentary, a film with a title that sounds like a Woody Allen joke: Blind Spot: Hitler’s Secretary. It’s a New York Film Festival pick and well worth seeing, just for the example of willed, obtuse blindness on the part of the secretary when she claims that she was insulated from all the terrible things happening during the war. But even Hitler’s secretary—unlike Heidegger, unlike the knee-jerk anti-American Left—feels the need to make some gesture of dismay at her "blind spot" in retrospect. But not the know-it-alls of the Left, who have never been wrong about anything since they adopted Marxism as their cult in college. What would the harm be in admitting that one didn’t know as much at in college as history has taught us now? But noooo … (as John Belushi liked to say). Instead, we get evasions and tortuous rationalizations like the Slavoj Ziz^ek zigzag: This extremely fashionable postmodern Marxist academic will concede the tens of millions murdered by Stalin, etc., but it’s "different" from the millions murdered by Hitler, because the Soviet project was built on good intentions, on utopian aspirations; the tens of millions dead were an unfortunate side effect, a kind of unfortunate, accidental departure from the noble Leninist path that still must be pursued. Tuesday, October 08, 2002
Posted
10/8/2002 10:16:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
"To my surprise, the best fried chicken I have ever ate in my life (outside of my mama's) was in Havana. Cuba is very clean, and the only crime you could openly see is prostitution. You don't see a lot of dirt and crime. People even leave their doors unlocked there. It reminded me of the deep, deep South in the 1950s, where everyone greeted each other as they walked by. Even the cars are from the 1950s. ...It was like stepping into Mayberry with Andy Griffith. I expected Aunt Bea and Opie to come running out any minute.Gee, I guess I missed Barney Fife's torture chambers. Maybe they were cut out when the show went into syndication.
Posted
10/8/2002 09:55:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The more these people whine about the need for UN blessing, the more I wonder whether they wouldn’t vote yes to a UN-levied tax on American paychecks - why, our “go-it-alone” tax policy must be enflaming the world, to say nothing of our “go-it-alone” highway system. And of our “go-it-alone” Apollo program in the 60s, well, the less said the better. Did we get a permission slip to leave earth and plant a unilateral boot on the Moon’s virgin soil? I don’t remember.He ends on a classic as well: If you believe that coalitions are always necessary, then the worst thing about the JFK assassination wasn’t the president’s death, but the possibility that Lee Harvey Oswald was acting alone. The Senators insisting on a coalition above all else are the left’s equivalent of the nutlog right-wing UN conspiracy crowd. The only difference is that Wellstone starts to worry if he doesn’t hear the black helicopters.
Posted
10/8/2002 08:28:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/8/2002 05:29:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/8/2002 01:16:59 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/8/2002 11:33:46 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Later I was passing the TV and saw Jerry Brown debating O’Reilly. Brown’s default facial posture always seems to be android-calm, as if his internal systems are in Sleep mode, waiting for the cursor to move. O’Reilly was quoting a “60 Minutes” story about PLO - Iraq links; Brown responded that since the Saudis fund radical mosques, shouldn’t we invade them? Thank you! I thought; there’s my column. “The proper response to this is a big wide grin: capital idea, old chap; why not, indeed? Let’s go! Glad you’re on board. We can liberate those American-born women our craven State department refuses to help; we can take the oil fields, set the pumps on “gush” and flood the world with sweet, cheap crude. We can defund the radical mosques, disband the religious police, and build swingsets in the parks they use for public hand-choppings. As an added bonus, the West will occupy the most holy sites of Islam, so we can photograph, fingerprint, and possibly detain anyone who comes for a pilgrimage. Invade Saudi Arabia? Dude! You are so hard core!”Of course, Brown would then respond by asking if you're with Lyndon LaRouche.
Posted
10/8/2002 11:26:57 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/8/2002 11:20:45 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/8/2002 02:18:30 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/8/2002 01:45:45 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/8/2002 12:27:48 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Monday, October 07, 2002
Posted
10/7/2002 11:48:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/7/2002 11:14:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/7/2002 10:48:09 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/7/2002 08:37:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/7/2002 08:37:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/7/2002 03:11:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/7/2002 02:07:27 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/7/2002 01:47:00 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/7/2002 01:18:15 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/7/2002 12:27:40 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/7/2002 12:11:51 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, October 06, 2002
Posted
10/6/2002 07:59:49 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 07:50:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
CHICAGO REQUIRES DISCLOSURE ON SLAVERY Chicago's City Council voted to require all companies doing business with the city to reveal any past "investment or profits from the slave industry." This is really just the first step from a bunch of devout racists and professional victims from demanding slavery reparations, but if companies admit to past involvement in slavery and are penalized in someway, it would certainly count as extortion. I hope businesses decide to leave Chicago and layoff their Chicago-resident workers instead of participating in this racket.Amen.
Posted
10/6/2002 06:51:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 05:27:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 04:14:30 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 04:07:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 03:22:28 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 02:11:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The antiwar crowd is making the mistake the generals are supposed to make: fighting this year’s war with the last war’s tactics. And the irony is that the current generation of college students apparently pays as much attention to their leftist professoriate as the latter did to their Western Civilization profs thirty years ago. Armed forces, intelligence services and law enforcement recruiting figures rose dramatically right after 9/11 and continue strong.Bové adds that "The roar of F-16’s over New York Harbor has, for the time being, if not entirely, muffled their voices rendered them squeaky, as if they’d taken one too many hits on nitrous oxide." I have no problem with careful thought and dissent given to government actions. Indeed, what is conservatism and libertarianism, and even classical liberalism, if not just that. But it's painful to see the same tired cliches dug up from 1968, especially when there's a 16-acre smoldering crater in downtown New York.
Posted
10/6/2002 01:52:25 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 01:24:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 01:17:09 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 12:01:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 11:32:58 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/6/2002 01:53:28 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |