| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, October 26, 2002
Posted
10/26/2002 03:23:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/26/2002 02:34:50 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/26/2002 02:23:52 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/26/2002 12:46:16 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/26/2002 12:12:43 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Friday, October 25, 2002
Posted
10/25/2002 11:41:50 PM
by Edward Driscoll
When a black public person like Harry Belafonte calls another African-American a slave to white masters, you see what I mean. When defenders of feminism call someone who files a sexual harassment lawsuit "trailer-trash," you get the picture. When a gay man can write a column asserting that another man is a "nasty faggot," it's hard to think of how much lower the discourse can get. When liberals denigrate the president as a "boy" or as a "sissy," to quote Maureen Dowd, homophobia doesn't lurk far behind. I remember a brief interaction I had with one Barbra Streisand long, long ago when the Paula Jones suit had just been filed. I asked Ms. Streisand what she thought of the suit. "Oh, she's just a little kurva," she replied, referring to Jones. That's a yiddish expression for "whore." Charming. Again, the simple test here is the following: If a conservative had used these expressions, would it have been denounced by liberals? The answer, obviously, is yes. Imagine if George Will had called Colin Powell a "house slave." Imagine if Pat Buchanan had called Barney Frank a "nasty faggot." Imagine if Trent Lott had called Hillary Clinton a whore. Do you think they'd be invited on "Larry King Live" to further elaborate on their comments?When you resort to the examples that Sullivan gives above, it says to me that you're losing the argument; you've relinquished your role as moral leader, and you've got to crank up the noise--and the hate--to compensate. Winners don't stoop to that kind of language.
Posted
10/25/2002 11:31:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/25/2002 11:25:09 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/25/2002 10:12:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
We've got some GOOD news for you Pink Floyd fans. Roger Waters' manager, Mark Fenwick, had confirmed that Pink Floyd: Live at Pompeii - The Director's Cut is being prepped for DVD release in March 2003. Not only that, Pink Floyd's Dark Side of the Moon is going to be released on DVD-Audio on 3/3/03 in honor of its 30th anniversary! We're still waiting for an update on Pulse, so we'll let you know if we hear anything.Sounds like it should be a good year for Floyd fans in 2003. Now if we could only get Roger Waters and Dave Gilmour reunited, or at least talk Gilmour into getting the rest of the gang back together for a tour...
Posted
10/25/2002 06:30:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Even when he was out of office, Herbert Hoover still tried bitterly to encourage Berlin to do damage to his enemies during an election. As von Ribbontrop recounts, in January 1944 the former president dropped by his residence for a private meeting. Hoover was concerned about Roosevelt's potential for a third term, and went on to explain that Berlin would be better off with someone else in the White House. If Roosevelt won, he warned, "There would not be a single agreement on arms control, especially on poison gas, as long as Roosevelt remained in power."Of course, the above never actually happened (although it would make a great Robert Harris thriller). However, according to an article by Peter Schweizer, a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, something very similar did happen--at least twice--with Jimmy Carter and our Cold War enemies, the Soviet Union: On repeated occasions, according to numerous Soviet accounts, Carter encouraged Moscow to influence American politics for his benefit or for the detriment of his enemies. Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin recounts in his memoirs how, in the waning days of the 1980 campaign, the Carter White House dispatched Armand Hammer to the Soviet embassy. Explaining to the Soviet Ambassador that Carter was "clearly alarmed" at the prospect of losing to Reagan, Hammer asked for help: Could the Kremlin expand Jewish emigration to bolster Carter's standing in the polls? "Carter won't forget that service if he is elected," Hammer told Dobrynin. According to Georgii Kornienko, first deputy foreign minister at the time, something similar took place in 1976, when Carter sent Averell Harriman to Moscow. Harriman sought to assure the Soviets that Carter would be easier to deal with than Ford, clearly inviting Moscow to do what it could through public diplomacy to help his campaign. Even when he was out of office, Carter still tried bitterly to encourage Moscow to do damage to his enemies during an election. As Dobrynin recounts, in January 1984 the former president dropped by his residence for a private meeting. Carter was concerned about Reagan's defense build-up and went on to explain that Moscow would be better off with someone else in the White House. If Reagan won, he warned, "There would not be a single agreement on arms control, especially on nuclear arms, as long as Reagan remained in power." While Carter's commitment to the principles of democracy, peace, and human rights is genuine, he has failed to grasp that good intentions are not enough. A commitment to championing human rights is no substitute for enacting policies that actually secure them — nor should it be an excuse for trying to manipulate an American election.If the above is true, imagine if Hoover really did go the Nazis--or Nixon to the Soviets, to try to swing an election? (Link found via Dean Esmay, who also links to a very interesting post by John Weidner on the same subject.)
Posted
10/25/2002 04:23:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/25/2002 02:52:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/25/2002 01:38:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/25/2002 01:32:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
If it hasn't happened already, we can expect that someone on the Cynthia McKinney/Nation of Islam fringe will soon be declaring that Johnny Muhammad is a Lee Harvey Oswald-style dupe whom the Bushes set up to further distract the country from the elections and to paint black Muslims in a bad light. After all, the guy does have three names, which is the only essential ingredient for a murky, government-backed assassin, right?Goldberg also has some thoughts on the upcoming election, especially in light of Paul Wellstone's death in a plane crash today.
Posted
10/25/2002 01:21:40 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/25/2002 02:21:15 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, October 24, 2002
Posted
10/24/2002 10:40:14 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/24/2002 05:36:28 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Eason Jordan, CNN's chief news executive, said the planned expulsion is "a draconian measure that will sharply curtail the world's knowledge about what is happening in Iraq." Jordan said CNN stands by Arraf and all of CNN's Iraq reporting as "accurate, fair, and forthright."If half of the things reported in the New Republic story we linked to last week on how Iraq manipulates its coverage are true, how on earth can Jordan say that with a straight face? (Insert obligatory Orwell reference of your choice here.) And then there's this one: Jordan dismissed as "absurd" Iraqi government allegations that CNN is a U.S. government propaganda service. Jordan added that "while CNN remains committed to reporting to the extent possible from Iraq, CNN will not compromise its journalistic principles in exchange for CNN access to any country."Ted Turner must be laughing his butt off over anyone thinking that CNN is a U.S. government propaganda service.
Posted
10/24/2002 05:24:56 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/24/2002 03:55:32 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/24/2002 03:49:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/24/2002 11:35:45 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/24/2002 01:50:33 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, October 23, 2002
Posted
10/23/2002 11:38:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 11:29:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 11:07:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 10:34:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 10:33:48 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 10:24:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
We don’t dress up our children in dynamite belts - and they think this makes us weak. We shield our children from death, not marinate them in its bloody juices, and they think this means we lack conviction. Morons. Come after our children, and you don’t know what you’re in for. You heard the part about awakening a sleeping giant? The sleeping giantess is the one you want to look out for, because she’ll tear off your head and lactate down your throat. Do not mess with American moms. If it is Islamic terrorism, it will be delightful to watch the root-causers explain this one. They could get away with writing off 9/11 as karmic justice, because it was so large, so theatrical, so massively calamitous that it instantly took on symbolic meaning. And symbols are always up for grabs. But shooting a dozen people at random is something the mind grasps and understands at once.Here's the key difference: everyone has stood in the open pumping gas, watching the numbers race, hoping we can hold it under twenty bucks, waving to the kid strapped in the backseat, wondering when the gas station started playing oldies through the loudspeaker - jesus, “My Eyes Adored You?” Haven’t heard that one in - [crack] [/life] This even the stupidest root-causer gets. But I doubt they’ll admit it. They’ll have to draw a direct link between American foreign policy and some poor guy getting his head opened up at a 7-11. It will require meta-meta-meta thinking so elaborate, so vaporous, so consumed with the sins of the West that they’ll look like someone pissing off the parapets of the tallest building in Cloud-Cuckoo Land. I think they’re up to the job.The sad thing he's right. But it may be sometime before "the root causers" get up enough nerve to actually say it in public.
Posted
10/23/2002 08:12:49 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The son of an immigrant candy shop owner, Lerner was a tough-minded kid, whose first job selling furniture paid him $75 a week. He saved enough to enter a deal to purchase a Cleveland apartment building. His real estate empire grew, and he went on to acquire banking interests in Baltimore. In 1991, he spun off the MBNA Credit Corp. from debt-ridden MNC Financial in Maryland with a stock offering that raised $995 million. He ended up with a 10 percent stake in MBNA and became its chief executive. Lerner also was chairman of Town & Country Trust, a Baltimore-based real estate investment trust that owns and manages residential properties. His friend and business partner, Peter B. Lewis, chairman of Progressive Insurance Corp., once described Lerner as ``the Michael Jordan'' of the investment business.
Posted
10/23/2002 05:55:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 05:43:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Now, it's obviously true that Acton, an eminent 19th-century liberal, had an abiding problem with powerful men who let their power go to their heads — but that's not really what he was talking about. He was talking about the tendency of people to say, "But Hitler built the autobahn," or "Think of all the good things Bill Clinton did," or "Remember that Nixon created the EPA." He wasn't necessarily offering as a rule of thumb that as you get more powerful you get more corrupt. Rather, he was saying that as you get more powerful the standard you are held to by historians must be more, not less, exacting. I'm not sure I entirely agree with that, but that's an argument for another day. Today, the "power corrupts" syllogism has — like so many other things — been translated into a credo of personal morality. It insists that power makes you a bad person — i.e., self-aggrandizing, cruel, megalomaniacal, blind to all moral distinctions, and so on. And that just isn't true. If it were, history would simply be the story of bad powerful men. And, while there most certainly were plenty of bad powerful men, there was also, for instance, George Washington. He might have become a king if he'd wanted, but he chose not to. He could have stayed president for life, but he chose not to. And, as NR's Richard Brookhiser has chronicled, Washington remained a decent man, courteous to a fault in fact, as he grew in influence and power. Likewise, Abraham Lincoln — at whom certain libertarians love to throw the Acton quote — may have suspended habeas corpus, but the evidence seems fairly lacking that he was a corrupt man or that he grew more corrupt as he grew more powerful. Last I checked, Jimmy Carter didn't become noticeably more praetorian for having had the arsenal of democracy at his disposal.Interesting essay, and well worth checking out.
Posted
10/23/2002 03:36:21 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 03:29:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Meow meow creepy meow meow meow cat with partial mastery of the English language meow meow rabies meow demonic possession meow meow meow trolley roadkill meow.I think once you've said that, you've said it all. UPDATE: Political (and WWF) wonks take note: there's a surprise appearance by Jesse Ventura in there, singing his 1984 solo classic, "The Body Rules". Perhaps Governor Ventura will resume his singing career, now that his time in politics appears to be winding down.
Posted
10/23/2002 02:22:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 02:17:40 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 01:05:16 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 01:01:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 11:59:48 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 11:26:40 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 11:13:41 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/23/2002 12:22:43 AM
by Edward Driscoll
"The Spanish government has cancelled a state banquet in honour of President Mohammed Khatami of Iran after Tehran insisted that he would not sit down to a meal with wine on the table," London's Daily Telegraph reports. Khatami had said that for religious reasons he would not eat at a table where alcohol was served. A Spanish Foreign Ministry spokesman says Madrid canceled the dinner to ensure that "the Spanish custom of drinking wine with meals was not dishonored." Tuesday, October 22, 2002
Posted
10/22/2002 07:11:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/22/2002 04:35:36 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/22/2002 02:54:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/22/2002 02:32:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Today's Democratic Party can best be understood as the product of an uneasy marriage between post-modernism and anti-modernism. This is a combination you see frequently in university environments that pride themselves for being on the cutting edge of society — but nonetheless favor medieval juntas in Baghdad, Havana, and Ramallah while finding fault with modern democracies like the United States and Israel. Some of our hippest Americans are liberal Democrats, and yet, if you look closely, the party has spent the last few elections campaigning on a very old Depression-era ideology. It's no coincidence that the two characters in that outrageous DNC Social Security cartoon were, on the one hand, a cool dude clad in jump suit and shades, and on the other hand, a doting grandma.And speaking of medieval juntas, here's an essay we found via Charles Johnson that begins with the following provocative statement: "the ideas of Benito Mussolini, the founder of Fascism, are remarkably similar to the ideas of modern-day Western Leftists".
Posted
10/22/2002 12:03:27 AM
by Edward Driscoll
I suspect that the educational establishment regards the insertion of these issues at every available opportunity to be part of their mission; far from wondering what the Million Mom March has to do with a class on establishing sleep schedules, they see these issues as indistinguishable from basic parenting skills. A good parent teaches ABCs; a good parent marches for peace; a good parent realizes the importance of five-point restraint carseats; a good parent subscribes to the MMM position on guns. The personal is the political, after all. And oh-so vice versa. Still, I bit my tongue. In some peculiar way, I felt as if bringing this matter up in the group would be as inappropriate as the materials themselves. Then, looking through the new handouts, I saw a thick sheaf titled EARTH PLEDGE.Good luck kids (and parents): you'll need it.“I pledge allegiance to our Earth, (the planet on which we live). And to fresh air, pure water, healthy dirt, life-giving plants and all the animals! One Earth - four oceans - seven continents - thousands of lakes and rivers! And I accept my duty to be an honorable citizen of this Earth, with respect and consciousness towards all.”On the back, a note from author Patricia Hauser: “This Pledge, written to the rhythm of the Pledge of Allegiance, was originally composed to develop and enhance planetary consciousness in the hearts and minds of the wonderful second and third graders in my class. “At our daily ‘Morning Meeting,’ the Class ‘President’ of the week reads the Earth Pledge with each line being repeated by the entire class. . . . Whenever global events are brought up in class, someone volunteers to locate the continent and country in which the event is occurring. This begins the expansion process and realization that we, on Mother Earth, are all in this together and what each one of us does makes a difference.” “Printed on recycled paper.” Monday, October 21, 2002
Posted
10/21/2002 08:16:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/21/2002 07:28:50 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/21/2002 05:25:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/21/2002 03:02:18 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/21/2002 02:53:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/21/2002 02:04:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/21/2002 01:52:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/21/2002 01:19:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/21/2002 12:48:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
A lot of reporters would understand American culture better if they read the DMN's religion coverage, which treats religion as a normal part of human affairs, like business, sports, fashion, or politics. The oddities, controversies, and scandals occur in a larger context; they don't define the entire endeavor. Covering American religion as it really exists means quoting sources whose assumptions strike nonbelievers as weird, but the alternative—pretending America is a secular country (or a Catholic one, another media illusion)—is simply inaccurate.
Posted
10/21/2002 10:49:49 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/21/2002 01:21:16 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, October 20, 2002
Posted
10/20/2002 11:45:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/20/2002 04:27:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/20/2002 03:35:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/20/2002 02:54:49 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/20/2002 02:38:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/20/2002 12:19:36 PM
by Edward Driscoll
James, While I'm far from an Objectivist, in college, Ayn Rand was my introduction to any kind of political/philosophic discussion that leaned towards the right of what liberalism evolved into in the 20th century, as it was for many people who eventually came to identify as libertarian, conservative, or a bit of both. In the essay directly preceding yours on [Blogcritics], Dean Esmay quotes Lionel Trilling in 1950, who wrote:In the United States at this time liberalism is not only the dominant but even the sole intellectual tradition. For it is the plain fact that nowadays there are no conservative or reactionary ideas in general circulation. This does not mean, of course, that there is no impulse to conservatism...but [they] do not, with some isolated and some ecclesiastical exceptions, express themselves in ideas but only in action or in irritable mental gestures which seek to resemble ideas.That was the environment that Rand wrote in. As Orrin Judd wrote (and he's no Randian, himself, incidentally), in his sympathetic review of Rand's "The Virtue of Selflessness" (which was the first Rand book I read, incidentally),In considering the philosophy of Ayn Rand, it is always important to keep in mind the prevailing intellectual climate against which she was forced to push. Though her absolutist vision of individualism may appear overly harsh and dogmatic to us now, it may well have been a necessary counterweight to the general acceptance of statism in the West in the wake of the Great Depression. At a time when European nations succumbed, disastrously, to the various allures of fascism, communism, and socialism, and even the United States experimented with the big government programs of the New Deal and Great Society, maybe her rigid espousal of freedom was a required response.As far as racism, Rand herself wrote:Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man's genetic lineage - the notion that a man's intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors.Incidentally, Rand's writing changed considerably over the years. After she completed her magnum opus, "Atlas Shrugged", she never wrote fiction again. And several her closest associates claimed she suffered from severe bouts of depression in her last decade. So that may explain some of the extreme harshness of her later stuff. You might want to check out some of her early books, as well as the 1999 documentary film, "A Sense of Life", available on DVD, which serves as a pretty good (if whitewashed) introduction to her life and the environment she wrote in. That's my take on Rand. Of course, my wife sums her up in a slightly more terse style: "Ayn Rand was a cranky old bitch with some good ideas, but she's her own worst enemy in presenting them." Ed
Posted
10/20/2002 11:34:27 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/20/2002 12:51:21 AM
by Edward Driscoll
In the 1990s, the phrase "do it for the children" became so much of a cliché that even The Simpsons made fun of it. But Don Rhymer and his wife Kate really did build their media room and its attached study for their three kids, ages 11, 14, and 16. "We really wanted our house to be the house, because you never know where your kids are going to be," Rhymer says. "So our attitude has always been, we'll just keep upgrading our systems so that the kids will want to stay here, rather than staying in someone else's basement, and doing God knows what."Given how expensive and uncivilized many movie theaters have become, there's no doubt that more and more families will chose to install media rooms where they can keep an eye on their kids and what they watch, as well. Incidentally, if you've never read it, Audio Video Interiors is an extremely handsome, Architectural Digest-style full color publication that was the grandaddy of the home theater movement. The Rhymer profile should be at your local Borders, Barnes and Noble, or speciality store--be sure to pick up a copy!
Home |