| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, November 02, 2002
Posted
11/2/2002 12:23:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/2/2002 12:23:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/2/2002 11:26:26 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/2/2002 02:19:13 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/2/2002 02:15:59 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/2/2002 12:41:56 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Friday, November 01, 2002
Posted
11/1/2002 05:22:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Pennsylvanians Saved From Depraved Bingo Nights (11/1) Pennsylvanians can play the lotto and bet on ponies. They may soon be able to play slots or gamble on river boats. But they can't play bingo at Wal-Mart. For years, the discount chain has permitted weekly bingo games. There was no admission fee, no charge to play, and no betting. The district attorney in Lebanon County has nonetheless decided the games violate the state's "small games of chance" law, which allows only state-licensed, not-for-profit community organizations to run bingo games. Wal-Mart asked the state to change the law. But Republican lawmakers voted down the idea, concerned that it would promote gambling.Bingo at Wal-Mart! The next thing you know, certain words will be creeping into your conversation: words like...swell. And "so's your old man!" Well if so my friends, you got trouble. Right here in Monongahela City. With a capital T! And that rhymes with B! And that stands for Bingo! (With my sincerest apologies to Robert Preston and The Music Man.)
Posted
11/1/2002 05:13:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/1/2002 04:36:16 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The next day, Judge Jerry Smith, who wrote the opinion and also happens to be a reader of Bashman's blog, fixed the error in an amended version (PDF). The judge e-mailed Bashman, personally thanking him for bringing the mistake to his attention. "It's the first time that I've noticed a weblog credited for pointing out an error and causing a correction (in a court decision)," Bashman said. "This example is noteworthy because it's the first time that something like this has come to light."
Posted
11/1/2002 01:45:40 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Legal experts were still reviewing the judge's multi-part decision tonight, but pundits such as Robert Lande, an antitrust professor at the University of Baltimore, said he was having trouble finding any concessions made by the judge to the nonsettling states. "This looks like an incredible victory for Microsoft," said Lande. "I see some little tweaks here and there but basically it's a near and complete Microsoft victory." "There were questions about could this be appealed," said Tom Bittman, an analyst at Gartner Inc. in Stamford, Conn. "It certainly can be appealed to the Supreme Court. But our opinion is the Supreme Court has basically already said they’re not interested, so anything that did go to them would be rejected, we believe. And we think the case is essentially closed."
Posted
11/1/2002 10:56:42 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, October 31, 2002
Posted
10/31/2002 11:46:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2002 11:28:14 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Although tomorrow's decision probably won't be the end of the Microsoft case, it will be one of its more dramatic turning points in a landmark antitrust case that began in the fall of 1998. Over a period of four months, Judge Kollar-Kotelly heard from a long list of witnesses over what should be done to satisfy the U.S. Court of Appeals decision that Microsoft illegally maintained its operating system monopoly. Depending on how Kollar-Kotelly rules, either the nonsettling states that refused to go along with a deal between the Department of Justice and Microsoft reached last year, the U.S., or the company itself may appeal tomorrow's ruling. This remedy phase follows an appeals court decision one year ago this month that rejected a lower court ruling to break up the company but upheld a finding that Microsoft had illegally maintained its monopoly in the operating systems market.Given that it's a Friday afternoon announcement, which are traditionally designed to reduce media coverage (much like the timing of Emory's recent issuance of its report on Michael Bellesiles), I wonder in which direction this will break. I'm not holding my breath for a quick resolution however: I wrote an article almost exactly one year ago titled "Microsoft Endgame?" for National Review. Glad there's a question mark in the title! UPDATE: Reuters has more, including a quote from antitrust attorney Steve Axinn, who says: "She's got to decide if this settlement meets the (public interest) standard, and if not what it would take to meet the standard." Whichever way it goes, Friday's ruling could be the end of the line in the long-running case. "If she approves the settlement, that's it," said Axinn. On the other hand, any modifications the judge makes to the settlement are unlikely to be overturned on appeal, he said. "She has broad discretion here," Axinn said.
Posted
10/31/2002 11:27:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2002 05:50:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2002 05:49:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2002 05:48:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2002 05:48:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2002 12:36:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2002 09:23:15 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2002 09:19:19 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Russian security forces are going to bury the terrorists from the Moscow theater siege wrapped in pigskin. Reader J Lichty, who forwarded the story, comments: “Imagine if Israel did this.” The Russians understand the mindset of the Islamic terrorist. Far from being a spiteful symbolic gesture, to the Islamozoids this is a deadly serious form of psychological warfare that strikes at the heart of their delusionary belief system.
Posted
10/31/2002 09:15:47 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2002 08:48:45 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2002 12:03:27 AM
by Edward Driscoll
![]() Wednesday, October 30, 2002
Posted
10/30/2002 11:01:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2002 09:39:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2002 07:19:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2002 07:15:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2002 07:03:30 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2002 05:39:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2002 04:56:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Here's all you need to know about Saturday's "peace" demonstration near the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington. Al Sharpton was the most moderate, pro-American speaker there. "We are the real patriots," he told the much-smaller-than-expected crowd. "We are the true face of America."Geez, I don't think so, Al! Incidentally, Chafets makes another good point regarding how toxic the "peace movement" has become near the end of his essay: As a hawk, this should make me happy, but it doesn't. Wartime democracies need a loyal opposition. A large, pro-American peace movement would be a good tool for keeping the government honest as it pursues its (very justified) war against the Islamic Axis.Nice idea, but I'm afraid the idea of "pro-American" largely departed the peace movement around 1967.
Posted
10/30/2002 03:38:16 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2002 03:23:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2002 02:21:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
T-Mobile USA today said it would set up wireless hot spots in airport lounges across the United States. T-Mobile agreed to establish hot spots for American Airlines, Delta, and United in around 100 airport clubs and lounges throughout the U.S. No financial details from the deals were released. T-Mobile has already inked hot spots deals with Borders Group and Starbucks, and plans to offer hot spots in about 2,000 locations in the U.S. by the end of the year.As to what an "802.11 hotspot" is, see our July article in Tech Central Station.
Posted
10/30/2002 02:03:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2002 12:54:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
That is what was so offensive about that rally: It shamelessly used Wellstone's death for partisan advantage while its organizers cynically accused their opponents of doing precisely that. Blaming others for something awful you've done is perhaps the defining attribute of Bill Clinton and his legacy on the Democratic party. Wellstone did many good things out of principle — including work with Jesse Helms, a man he grew to befriend, on human rights in China. But he will now be invoked by Democrats everywhere simply to get out the vote, beat up Republicans, and raise millions of dollars in campaign contributions. In short, so long as they hold onto the Senate, the Clinton Democrats — who often found Wellstone's principles inconvenient — will find him more useful dead than alive. They will rewrite the story of his life to fit any cause they choose — much as they have done with other Democratic martyrs like John and Robert Kennedy (a Cold War anti-Communist and the attorney general who personally authorized the bugging of Martin Luther King, respectively). Wellstone's distinctiveness and honesty will melt in a warm pool of mass-marketed nostalgia. And, if Republicans complain, Democrats will simply charge insensitivity and laugh all the way to the bank.Meanwhile, Andrew Stuttaford reports that "Rick Kahn, the friend of Paul Wellstone who made what has been seen as an excessively partisan speech at the late senator's memorial service was, apparently, unrepentant afterwards". Kahn was quoted as saying: "Can they not one time, just one time, step forward for Paul and honor that friendship? Why can't they do that? One time, for one week. That's what we're asking. That they go out there and say Paul Wellstone did this wonderful work and we need to keep his legacy alive by sending his successor to his seat. "Here's the photo that started it all. In retrospect, it was probably wise of the Wellstone family to tell Dick Cheney that he wasn't welcome at the funeral. Wellstone's death released a remarkable outpouring of sympathy from both parties. Peggy Noonan's warm, admiring essay is representative of the tone from a wide range of columnists and bloggers. But Wellstone's awesomely tacky funeral has destroyed much of that bipartisan goodwill. Its ill-will has already caused Orrin Judd to write: Out of respect for the wishes of the Wellstone family and the Democrat Party we too will abjure decency and treat the Senator's death as a purely partisan matter. In that regard, while we regret the manner of his departure, we would note that on the day he died the prospects for human freedom were improved in America and the world.Expect to see more such writing as the anger from this ill-conceived event festers. Next time, bury Caesar, praise him--and then have the pep rally, the day after. UPDATE: CNSNews.com is reporting: The chair of the Minnesota Republican Party is calling on the state's television and radio stations to give the GOP equal time to campaign, given the partisan tone of Tuesday night's memorial for the late Sen. Paul Wellstone, who along with his wife and daughter, perished in a plane crash last week.UPDATE: Wellstone's campaign manager now says, "It would probably have been best not to have the election mentioned." Gee, you think? Tuesday, October 29, 2002
Posted
10/29/2002 04:17:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
[Hanson] went to the trouble to make sure it signaled the same "religious" atmosphere as the places where Eminem and his rivals originally performed. "This was their church," he said during a recent visit to New York. "They got from it what people get from church — a sense of community, spirituality, hope. It became the cornerstone of the direction I gave in finding other locations.Move along, no moral equivalence to see here. You can go about your business. These aren't the droids you're looking for. I realize I'm about to sound like a boring old fart, but...rap clubs as churches?? I don't claim to any sort of religious scholar. But gee, I don't recall hearing 12 letter words words built around the letters "M" and "F" in my church--or in weekly school chapel services--growing up. UPDATE: James Bowman also has some thoughts on the man whom the New York Times recently called "the world’s best rapper".
Posted
10/29/2002 12:06:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/29/2002 01:59:25 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/29/2002 01:52:10 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/29/2002 01:26:50 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Kentucky CIO Aldona Valicenti said accepting federally endorsed standards wouldn't bother most state CIOs. Though the idea of the network would be to ease the exchange of homeland security information, there's no reason why other types of information couldn't transverse it, even commercial data, he said. Indeed, employing one type of technology to address a wide range of processes is a leitmotif of Bush administration technology managers. Planners of the original interstate highway system during the Cold War years a half-century ago weren't concerned about the movement of goods and civilians--today's primary users--but to facilitate the transport of military equipment and personnel. Today, Cooper notes, drivers may occasionally see a convoy of National Guard trucks carrying weekend warriors crawl along. Monday, October 28, 2002
Posted
10/28/2002 09:34:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
In doing some research for today’s Mondale column, I reread his speech at the 1984 Democratic convention. Here’s a real time-capsule moment for you:“When we speak of change, the words are Gary Hart's. When we speak of hope, the fire is Jesse Jackson's. When we speak of caring, the spirit is Ted Kennedy's. When we speak of the future, the message is Geraldine Ferraro”Well, at least one out of four didn’t cheat on his wife. What a snapshot of 1984: a time when Gary Hart was the 845th blurry photocopy of JFK to be handed around, when Jesse Jackson was regarded as a bulwark of righteous enlightenment instead of a self-aggrandizing shakedown artist; when Ted Kennedy was a big pickled Care Bear, and Geraldine Ferraro was the future, not a footnote-to-be. I was a hardcore Democrat at the time, and I remember watching the speech and thinking: we are going to lose. We are going to lose 51 states. Puerto Rico will demand statehood just for the chance not to vote for this guy.
Posted
10/28/2002 09:00:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
![]() Yeager, with Edwards test pilot Lt. Col. Troy Fontaine in the back seat, opened the event by climbing to just over 30,000 feet and impressed the crowd with his infamous sonic boom. Yeager first broke the sound barrier at Edwards Air Force Base, Calif., in October 1947 when he accelerated his rocket-powered Bell X-1 to the speed of Mach 1.06 and shattered the myth of the sound barrier forever. The crowd hushed as Yeager landed and taxied under an archway of water gushing from two Edwards fire trucks per Air Force tradition. For his final military flight, Yeager was accompanied in the air with longtime friend and colleague retired Maj. Gen. Joe Engle flying his own F-15. The two legendary test pilots have been flying together for decades. "This is a fun day for us because we get to fly good airplanes and do something we've loved to do for some time," Yeager said. The general announced earlier this year that 60 years of military flying is long enough. "Now is a good time," said Yeager. "I've had a heck of good time and very few people get exposed to the things I've been exposed to. I'll keep on flying P-51s and light stuff, but I just feel it's time to quit."The actual article contains larger versions of the above photo. See if the name painted on the nose of Yeager's F-15 rings a bell. (Thanks to Orrin Judd for sending us the link to the above article.)
Posted
10/28/2002 05:33:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2002 05:04:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
“[In past conflicts], you wrote it to be the history,” he said. “We have no history now of the Persian Gulf War. We have only what the military reporters wrote and that’s what their bosses told them. That’s not good enough.” Cronkite admitted that in some cases, such as the recent congressional report that outlined the country’s homeland security weaknesses, he wonders whether or not reporting all the facts is in the country’s best interest. “It seems to me that as citizens, we should get this info so we can shout to Washington, ‘Let’s get this game going,’” he said. “But at the same time, there’s a terrorist cell sitting there saying, ‘That’s how we do it.’” But for a country’s citizens to be truly free and the government to be held accountable, he said people must have a free press that gathers all the facts. He said an example of the alternative would be a situation like what he witnessed after WWII, after the Nazi concentration camps were freed. The people who lived in nearby towns cried at the sights of the persecuted Jews and told reporters they had no idea of what was going on behind the walls of the camps. Many were probably telling the truth, he said, but that did not make them any less responsible. “They applauded as Hitler closed down the independent newspaper and television stations and only gave them his propaganda,” Cronkite said. “When they did not rise up and say, ‘Give us a free press,’ they became just as guilty.”OK, maybe it's just me. But he is comparing the military to the Nazis--an analogy that's got to be getting a little worn out these days. UPDATE: ScrappleFace has the inevitable denouement to this story. Of course, Cronkite should have seen it coming from a mile away. UPDATE: As James Taranto notes, "Ah yes, the Weimar Republic--the Golden Age of Television."
Posted
10/28/2002 02:44:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2002 02:35:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2002 02:33:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Everywhere you turn these days, someone on the left is denouncing President Bush as Hitler, Satan, a terrorist or a tyrannical emperor. A Yale law professor said Bush is "the most dangerous man on Earth." A famous editor referred to Bush as "a lawn jockey" and "Pinocchio." Some of the angry rhetoric flirts with the fringe idea that the United States planned the terrorist attacks. A Purdue professor said "there is no ground to be certain" that America and Israel aren't behind the 9/11 attacks. A Columbia law professor compared 9/11 to the Reichstag fire in Nazi Germany -- Bush is not responsible for 9/11, he said, but he exploited a national disaster to suspend civil liberties, just like Hitler. A Berkeley professor helpfully pointed out that some Indonesian groups think the U.S. planned the Bali bombing. The rhetoric accurately reflects the current condition of much of the left -- bitter, stymied, alienated, politically impotent, full of loathing for America and the West, and totally unable to address the crisis wrought by 9/11, except to imply (or say) that the U.S. deserved to be attacked.
Posted
10/28/2002 02:20:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
We may in fact need an update of Mike Godwin's Hitler constant, with a corollary that the first person to use the word "McCarthy" in a debate automatically forfeits the point.Good plan.
Posted
10/28/2002 02:03:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2002 01:57:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2002 11:49:55 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2002 11:32:59 AM
by Edward Driscoll
While Jordan is officially allied with the United States, anti-American sentiment has been rising with public opposition to a threatened U.S. attack on Iraq, Jordan's eastern neighbor and primary trading partner. The kingdom's 1994 peace treaty with Israel also has made it a target for Muslim militants and terrorist groups.
Posted
10/28/2002 11:26:24 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, October 27, 2002
Posted
10/27/2002 11:04:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/27/2002 03:08:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/27/2002 01:00:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The thinking behind these films is deep but not profound. They're ritualistic grief at what man has done to the planet. "The logical flaw," as I pointed out in my review of "Powaqqatsi," is that "Reggio's images of beauty are always found in a world entirely without man--without even the Hopi Indians. Reggio seems to think that man himself is some kind of virus infecting the planet--that we would enjoy the earth more, in other words, if we weren't here."Or as I recently wrote about Koyaanisqatsi for Blogcritics: Running 87 minutes without a stitch of dialogue, Koyaanisqatsi nonetheless carries a powerful emotional message. Of course, what that message is depends on what the viewer wants to take away from the film. I think it's a safe bet that Godfrey Reggio, the director of Koyaanisqatsi and Powaqqatsi believes, more or less, in most of the standard shibboleths of the environmental left: man is bad, technology is bad, nature is best left pristine, etc. Kill 'em all: let Gaia sort it out.As far as this latest film, Ebert writes: Although "Naqoyqatsi" has been some 10 years in the making, it takes on an especially somber coloration after 9/11. Images of marching troops, missiles, bomb explosions and human misery are intercut with trademarks (the Enron trademark flashes past), politicians and huddled masses, and we understand that war is now our way of life. But hasn't war always been a fact of life for mankind? We are led to the uncomfortable conclusion that to bring peace to the planet, we should leave it.Of course. The far fringes of the environmental left really would be much happier if the planet was vacated. Of course, so few of them are willing to put their money where their mouths are, and check out early in an effort to speed the process up. Reggio, with the dramatic music of Philip Glass underscoring them, creates awesome images, and I do plan to see Naqoyqatsi if it makes its way out to San Jose. But to take their underlying message seriously is dangerous--not to mention deadly.
Posted
10/27/2002 12:30:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |