| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Friday, November 22, 2002
Posted
11/22/2002 03:47:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
If nothing else, "Die Another Day" will be remembered for this bit of ingenuity: The producers found a way to get product placement for three different cars. Jinx gets a Ford Thunderbird, the villain gets a Jaguar, and Bond gets his Aston Martin. The negotiations for how the duel between these machines was to proceed must have been dizzying. So where does "Die Another Day" fit in the hierarchy? Somewhere beneath "Moonraker" and above, say, "Casino Royale."Ouch. UPDATE: On the other hand, Roger Ebert liked it. I like Ebert (we've exchanged a handful of emails, and he's always been gracious), but he can be--shall we say--merciful at times: I don't think my wife ever forgave him for giving the excrementally awful Buffalo 66 three stars.
Posted
11/22/2002 03:23:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/22/2002 02:36:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Listen to me, you tin-headed little s**t. You are not my moral superior because you ooze emotion over every single example of unfairness on the planet. In fact, you are the opposite, because you obviously lack the judgement necessary to make the tough decisions which will result in material aid to the disadvantaged. I'm sure it makes you feel fabulous to wail, moan and gnash your teeth about environmental injustice while you drive the Pollution-mobile, but I don't see your ass biking to work every morning to spare us your greenhouse gases--the very ones that are now filling my vehicle. The fact that you have bought into the idea that empathy is an either/or enterprise doesn't fill me with optimism about your reasoning skills, either. Either a bleeding heart or none at all, eh? Ummm, no, you freaking moron. The application of logic to emotionally charged issues isn't easy, but it is necessary, and a little more effective than that glib slogan on sticky paper that appears to be holding your vehicle together. You suck.There's more--click on over to read it. Not exactly a level of invective I can work myself up into on a regular basis, but the sentiment is very much appreciated. (Link found via Joanne Jacobs.)
Posted
11/22/2002 02:12:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/22/2002 02:06:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/22/2002 11:55:13 AM
by Edward Driscoll
But many in the party appear frightened by shadows, such as Democratic National Committee Chairman Terry McAuliffe, who dismissed the bipartisan commission's findings as "classic Chicken Little politics."Something McAuliffe and many of his party are experts at.
Posted
11/22/2002 12:42:26 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, November 20, 2002
Posted
11/20/2002 07:45:04 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/20/2002 06:01:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Leave it to ABC’s Peter Jennings to highlight the plight of a Pakistani who survived being detained at the U.S. facility at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. After Jennings on Tuesday night helpfully noted how “human rights organizations have complained the U.S. is violating the prisoners’ rights and acting without regard for international law,” reporter Bob Woodruff narrated a story about the prisoner’s claims of mistreatment, including the “torture” of air conditioning. Woodruff empathized with how the man, who is now back in Pakistan, was “swept up in the chaos of the war, he was handed over to the U.S. and flown to Cuba, blind-folded and tied.” The Pakistani charged that “once gave a call for prayer, and after that, we were punished...They beat us, they hit us on the head, grabbed us by the neck.” The man, “who had never seen air conditioning before, thought it was a kind of torture,” Woodruff related before the man complained about how “they pumped cold air from a hole in the ceiling. This was the punishment. The air was very cold.” Most of the residents of Cuba outside the U.S. naval base dream of such a “punishment.”I always assume Peter Jennings will take the anti-American stance on any topic, but doesn't he have enough common sense to realize how silly this must sound to the average viewer? Couldn't he have killed this story instead of broadcasting it on TV?
Posted
11/20/2002 04:20:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/20/2002 04:11:21 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/20/2002 02:25:21 PM
by Edward Driscoll
What theologian are you? A creation of Henderson (Link found on Group Captain Mandrake's Weblog.)
Posted
11/20/2002 02:19:48 PM
by Edward Driscoll
According to a senior Senate leadership source, the election results were barely in before Mr. Jeffords' office put out feelers to his former party's leaders. The message? That the Vermonter would be happy to caucus with the GOP — so long as he retained his committee chairmanship. Republican leaders rightly rolled their eyes.Orrin Judd has more on America's jumping, jiving, hip-hoppingist Senator.
Posted
11/20/2002 10:40:48 AM
by Edward Driscoll
When the subject is Iraq, the U.S. government is proactive, articulate and specific. But when it comes to militant Islam, officialdom is reactive, awkward and vague. Take the issue of preventive security. To stop Iraqi sabotage and terrorism, The New York Times recently reported, Washington tracks thousands of Iraqi citizens and Iraqi-Americans who might pose a domestic risk. It even has plans in place to arrest Saddam Hussein's sympathizers suspected of planning terrorist operations. No comparable program exists in the war against militant Islam. (I define militant Islam as not Islam, not terrorism, but a terroristic reading of Islam). Fearful of being accused of "profiling," law enforcement treads super gingerly around those who back this totalitarian ideology. Thus, the airline security system randomly harasses passengers instead of looking for travelers known to sympathize with the likes of Ayatollah Khomeini and Osama bin Laden. Immigration officials focus on superficial characteristics (nationality, criminal record) and ignore what is truly relevant (ideology). The White House would not consider inviting apologists praising life in Iraq to festive functions. But it welcomed many of militant Islam's sympathizers at a Ramadan dinner hosted by the president earlier this month. Or consider this: When did you last hear praise for Saddam's regime on an American television talk show? It does not happen. But media outlets routinely offer a platform to those promoting militant Islam. If "war on Iraq" is easy to say, "war on militant Islam" is not. Instead, the Bush administration adopted the euphemistic "War on Terror." Why the readiness to confront Iraq head-on but reluctance to do so when it concerns militant Islam?Read the rest of it for the answers.
Posted
11/20/2002 08:35:36 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/20/2002 08:16:48 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, November 19, 2002
Posted
11/19/2002 03:33:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Monday, November 18, 2002
Posted
11/18/2002 11:33:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/18/2002 11:10:08 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/18/2002 06:13:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/18/2002 11:15:20 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/18/2002 10:28:59 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/18/2002 10:07:56 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, November 17, 2002
Posted
11/17/2002 08:25:29 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/17/2002 04:11:32 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/17/2002 03:09:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/17/2002 02:48:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/17/2002 02:26:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/17/2002 02:22:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/17/2002 02:18:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/17/2002 02:13:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/17/2002 01:03:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
![]()
Home |