| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Friday, October 31, 2003
Posted
10/31/2003 02:49:09 PM
by Edward Driscoll
By way of comparison, let me offer the example of my old friend Diana Mosley, who died recently at the age of 93, a victim of the Paris heatwave. In the Thirties, Diana got the hots for Fascism and Nazism: Hitler came to her wedding, she thought he had exquisite table manners, etc. When war broke out, the Government in Britain had her jailed as a possible security threat. After the war, she began a lifelong exile in France. She didn’t kill anyone, she didn’t take up arms against her country, but she never quite sufficiently regretted her youthful support for a totalitarian philosophy that proved to be genocidal. Although she was witty, charming and a biographer of distinction, it would be impossible to imagine a play about Diana Mosley in which her enthusiasm for Nazism was not placed squarely at the centre. Like Diana, Dalton Trumbo didn’t kill anyone or take up arms against his country. Like Diana, he went to jail and paid a price for being merely a youthful supporter of a totalitarian philosophy that proved to be genocidal. Though the play won’t tell you the answer to that famous question – “Are you now or have you ever…?” – the answer is: yes, he was. The more interesting question is: How do you feel about getting one of the great moral questions of the century wrong?Don't hold your breath waiting for a play to answer that question anytime soon! But do read the whole thing, as they say.
Posted
10/31/2003 02:29:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2003 01:37:50 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2003 01:26:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
In the 19th century, we were motivated by manifest destiny. In the 20th century, it was the idea that it was our duty to contain the spread of Communism and keep open the door for freedom. Today there is no substantial challenge to American ideals.As James Taranto wrote, "Islamic fundamentalism? Never heard of it."
Posted
10/31/2003 12:55:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2003 12:41:51 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/31/2003 10:40:03 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, October 30, 2003
Posted
10/30/2003 08:07:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2003 08:00:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2003 12:55:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2003 11:40:06 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/30/2003 11:38:06 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, October 29, 2003
Posted
10/29/2003 10:59:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/29/2003 12:56:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Back to the house. Get to work. Call up browser. Learn that Howard Dean temporarily called himself a “metrosexual.” Shudder. Do they have that on tape? Lee Atwater would have the commercial in production already: Split screen. On the right, Bush in flight suit, walking on the deck, waving, giving the thumbs up. On the left, Dean in a loop: “I’m a metrosexual. I’m a metrosexual. I’m a metrosexual.” Nothing more. Tagline: Bush. He doesn’t moisturize. He doesn’t tweeze. And he never had a pedicure.When I wrote my original post, I was tempted to ask if this was Dean's Dukakis-in-the-tank moment. Maybe it will be.
Posted
10/29/2003 11:45:36 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/29/2003 11:22:08 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/29/2003 11:05:16 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, October 28, 2003
Posted
10/28/2003 09:30:46 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2003 03:44:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2003 03:17:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2003 01:56:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Like the satisfied porcines in [George Orwell's Animal Farm], the summiteers in Malaysia blithely adopt the language of freedom and human rights. But when they talk about oppression, they mean being deprived of the right to dictate. Those who see Mahathir as a moderate are confusing the trappings of modernization with the modernization of the mind. Muslims, including the most fundamentalist variety, would be happy to embrace a very modern device, the nuclear bomb, in the service of an aim as primitive as the caveman's club. Mahathir's speech shows that the West has made progress in convincing the Muslim world that the means it employs are futile. But the speech was also a step backward in that it challenged Muslims to wage jihad with brains, not to snap out of it altogether. The goal of the war against terrorism should be to cure the Muslim world of a form of jihad that kills us and enslaves them. The first sign that a real corner has been turned will be when Muslims start talking about living with, rather than destroying, the State of Israel.We've certainly got our work cut out achieving that.
Posted
10/28/2003 11:58:26 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2003 11:49:26 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2003 11:33:50 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Currently, 59 out of the 79 (75%) of people who have voted in this admittedly slanted poll have selected option 1, which is, "yes. Absolutely".Oliver Stone, call your office!
Posted
10/28/2003 11:26:00 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/28/2003 10:44:16 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, October 26, 2003
Posted
10/26/2003 10:31:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
It seems to me that the far left anti-war message, misguided before the war, is close to obscene today, and tells us something about what we're up against. Before the war, these people claimed they weren't pro-Saddam; they were just pro-peace. But now that the Iraqi people have the first chance in living memory to have a decent, pluralist and democratic country, these demonstrators want to abandon them to chaos, terror, civil war and a possible new dictatorship. The only connective thread in this movement is hatred of the United States. (Oh, and Israel. Some posters [carried by protestors] openly called for the eradication of the Jewish state.)Of course, they're far from the only protestors to do so.
Posted
10/26/2003 07:24:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/26/2003 03:40:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/26/2003 12:29:25 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/26/2003 12:04:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
10/26/2003 11:24:07 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |