| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Tuesday, November 25, 2003
Posted
11/25/2003 10:30:05 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/25/2003 09:44:36 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/25/2003 09:25:22 AM
by Edward Driscoll
As we settle down to the Thanksgiving table in a few days, we might remind ourselves that whatever other problems grip our country, lack of vitality is not one of them. In fact, we may look back on the period beginning in the middle of the 1980's as the Great Rejuvenation. American life has improved in almost every measurable way, and far from regressing toward the mean, the U.S. has become a more exceptional nation.Wonder how paragraphs like those are sitting with the average reader of the Times who feels, based on the information he's been spoonfed by the Times, that (a) George H.W. Bush was right when he called Reaganomics "voodoo economics" (and then later lost his bid for reelection when he steered away from its central tenant) and (b) that the "worst economy of 50 years" recession was actually, as Brooks accurately labels it, shallow and minor.
Posted
11/25/2003 09:11:45 AM
by Edward Driscoll
There's quite a ways to go before Election Day 2004. But the race may already be over, and, to their grief, the Democrats know it.He gives three reasons ("one minor, one middling and one major") why. The Democrats' debate last night probably didn't advance their cause. UPDATE: Michael Barone would seem to agree with Podhoretz.
Posted
11/25/2003 01:48:48 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Monday, November 24, 2003
Posted
11/24/2003 02:05:19 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/24/2003 02:01:26 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, November 23, 2003
Posted
11/23/2003 06:21:56 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/23/2003 03:02:14 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/23/2003 01:53:53 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Arthur Sulzberger Jr describes the work of Walter Duranty as 'slovenly.' That simply misses the point. Duranty wasn't slovenly; he was an active and knowing apologist of mass murder, tyranny, and brutality. If the Times had won a Pulitzer for someone denying the Holocaust in Nazi Germany, there would not even be a question of the Pulitzer standing. But what Duranty did was no different. It was a wilful attempt to disguise mass murder in order to promote Communist ideology. It wasn't slovenly; it was extremely diligent and entirely malign. The NYT doesn't see this. They still fail to see that tolerating mass murder on the left is no different than the same on the right.Not all that surprising, actually.
Posted
11/23/2003 02:22:08 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/23/2003 12:56:14 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |