| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Thursday, December 04, 2003
Posted
12/4/2003 09:16:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
1) nothing to do 2) a sharp knife 3) a large lime 4) a patient cat 5) too much tequila 6) and it's football season?This.
Posted
12/4/2003 02:04:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/4/2003 12:23:36 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/4/2003 11:17:31 AM
by Edward Driscoll
The way to defeat Bush is not to advertise how much you hate him. Hard-core ideologues who hate Bush are not going to decide this election. They'll vote for the Democrat, as they do every four years, but there aren't enough of them to elect a Democrat. You need swing voters to do that. Hatred may motivate the left to contribute money, but it is hardly an effective talking point for public consumption if you want to win elections. Ari Emanuel, a talent agent who represents Larry David and whose brother served in the Clinton White House and now in Congress, knew just how bad the Drudge story was for Democrats. "People are assembling over a political issue -- the 2004 election," he told the press in response to the ruckus about hating Bush. "The invite didn't say 'Hate Bush,' and I don't think (the Drudge story) was productive." Productive? I bet it produced a lot of money for George Bush. And worse, it helps produce votes for him. The people whose votes Democrats will need to defeat George Bush don't hate him. On a personal level, they like him. They need to be convinced not to vote for him, for reasons that have to do with the war, or special interests or the economy. "Hate Bush" headlines do just the opposite.Of course, it wouldn't be the first time.
Posted
12/4/2003 11:05:01 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Trudeau's political instincts are as unerring as ever. Whether harping on Schwarzenegger's rowdy behavior, cheerleading Wesley 'Help, Mary!' Clark as an intellectual, or getting on the wrong side of every position relating to Iraq, Trudeau is a marvel of the thoughtless conservatism of today's upscale liberal. He represents a faux bohemian class whose political niche appears more like a therapeutic echo chamber than an ideology. They have no solutions to offer, just more bitching. Trudeau exacerbates the effect with strips that don't read like a dialogue between two characters but like Trudeau talking to himself in a didactic lecture for the reader's benefit. I doubt an example is necessary to anyone who has gotten through more than a week's worth of his material. It's an embarrassing habit moreso because Trudeau does not appear to realize that you can't have a Socratic dialogue with yourself: that's masturbation.Fortunately, the Internet has allowed a few competitors to emerge...
Posted
12/4/2003 10:52:53 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/4/2003 10:26:17 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, December 03, 2003
Posted
12/3/2003 08:17:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/3/2003 01:16:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
What divides our society now is not the old dichotomy between "liberal" and "conservative," it is those who oppose fascism and those who want to let it be. On this blog, I am going to start calling those sides what they really are -- anti-fascist and pro-fascist.Meryl Yourish adds: So Roger has the new term: They are now pro-fascists. How else to describe those who insist that Yasser Arafat is 'the sole legitimate representative of the palestinian people' yet refuse to admit that he was elected in a sham election against a prop candidate, while all the true candidates were terrorized into not running? How else to explain those who want Ariel Sharon remanded to an international court for 'war crimes' while insisting that Saddam Hussein must be removed by his own people because that is an 'internal' matter? How else to describe those who protest George Bush's visit to Britain while completely ignoring the destruction of a British embassy and bank by Islamic terrorists, because that is not the message they're trying to get out that day?George Orwell would likely agree.
Posted
12/3/2003 12:00:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, December 02, 2003
Posted
12/2/2003 11:07:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/2/2003 10:53:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
A theory went around a few weeks ago that Wesley Clark was some kind of Clinton stalking horse. After listening to Dean on the stump and then to Senator Clinton, I think she’s got a simpler plan: Stand aside as Howard Dean leads the Democrats to catastrophe, including seat losses in the Senate and possibly the House as well, and then step forward as the candidate of Democratic pragmatism and moderation. In the1990s, conservatives described Hillary’s paranoia and scheming as “Nixonian.” But remember that in 1968, Richard Nixon ran as a “new Nixon.” That’s what we’re going to see in 2008: a “new Hillary” – less nasty, more statesmanlike. Might work; certainly it will work better than Howard Dean’s plan to re-enact the 1972 McGovern campaign – only this time, as Karl Marx might have said, as farce.Unlike some, I doubt very much that we're going to see President Bush replace Dick Cheney with Condi Rice as his VP in 2004. But I could definitely see Condi running for the presidency in '08. And if it's against Hillary, it will be a political wonk's dream come true.
Posted
12/2/2003 06:48:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/2/2003 01:40:59 PM
by Edward Driscoll
If the United States and the United Nations truly want peace and security let them fulfill the hopes of the common people everywhere -- let them work together to accomplish on a worldwide scale, precisely the kind of democratic association of free people which characterizes the Soviet Union today.Paul Robeson, who joins Frida Kahlo as another unrepentant Stalinist to be honored with his own American Postal Service stamp. As The New Criterion asks, "what's next, a stamp honoring Julius Rosenberg"? UPDATE: Andrew Sullivan unearths an even more jaw-dropping quote by Robeson, and asks, "Would anyone who had written such things about Hitler in 1945 now be celebrated on a postage stamp?"
Posted
12/2/2003 12:47:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/2/2003 12:18:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/2/2003 12:06:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/2/2003 02:57:31 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/2/2003 12:20:56 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/2/2003 12:04:39 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Only one 'analyst' has suggested the parallel between Bush's domestic policy and Nixon's domestic policy, and you're reading his website right now.Err, sorry Maharushie, but actually, we noted the comparison in the very early days of this blog, a year and a half ago! See also this article by James Pinkerton from a year ago, titled "Richard Milhouse Bush". Monday, December 01, 2003
Posted
12/1/2003 11:07:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The city of Cerritos, Calif., is planning to become the biggest Wi-Fi hot spot in the nation. The city, southeast of Los Angeles, inked a deal Monday with Aiirnet Wireless to install wireless data transmitters throughout its borders to give residents, businesses and city employees high-speed Internet access...Of course, the idea of city-wide 802.11 is nothing new to our readers.
Posted
12/1/2003 06:58:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/1/2003 12:30:40 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, November 30, 2003
Posted
11/30/2003 10:37:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
This week the G.O.P. behaved as a majority party in full. The Republicans used the powers of government to entrench their own dominance. They used their control of the federal budget to create a new entitlement, to woo new allies and service a key constituency group, the elderly.As Orrin Judd writes, "One does wish that Ronald Reagan were in possession of his senses so that he could see his people arrive in the Promised Land." As the spiritual leader of the Republican party, no doubt, the Gipper would enjoy the destination. But would the small government-oriented conservative who gave the legendary "Rendezvous With Destiny" speech in 1964 approve of the route taken to get there? UPDATE: Somewhat related to Brooks' essay, Donald Lambro writes: The last three Democrats to occupy the White House were Southerners, two of them governors. Fewer governors means fewer chief executives to promote for higher office, a gloomy picture indeed of the Democrats' political future.
Posted
11/30/2003 10:21:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/30/2003 10:09:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/30/2003 09:53:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
11/30/2003 09:36:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |