| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, December 20, 2003
Posted
12/20/2003 09:37:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/20/2003 05:10:25 PM
by Edward Driscoll
No belief requires greater and more repressive conformity than that every individual is entitled to their own faith. The reasons for this are twofold and rather obvious: first, any manifestation of an organized and popular belief system must be attacked, lest those who differ be made to feel so much as uncomfortable--this is variously referred to as multiculturalism, tolerance, or political correctness; second, because there are no longer any socially imposed shared behavioral standards, the State must step in and dictate and enforce its own standards. So does Ms Hunt's imagined freedom lead inevitably to its opposite. Brits and other Europeans are no less conformist than Americans, they just conform to a belief which is so indivualistic as to make society untenable and to make statism necessary.He's absolutely right: individual liberty requires great personal responsibility. Just ask that sage philosopher, the late Ben Parker.
Posted
12/20/2003 04:07:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
So in other words, they admit the media focus on violence and aren't very interested in the reconstruction of Iraq, but at the same time would also like to reassure us that they're unbiased. They've simply decided what information is appropriate for us to consume. Shh! Relax! Just go back to sleep! I must have missed the part where the government was planning to force people to watch C-SPAN Baghdad, in Clockwork Orange-style restraint chairs with eyelid clamps. Media elites sure do start to seethe (in their mild-mannered fashion) at the possibility of losing the tiniest bit of control over the information spigot. It's hard to see anything wrong with another point of view from Iraq, even if it does come from (horror!) the US government. If people aren't interested, they won't watch. What the elites are really worried about is that people will begin making up their own minds.And we can't have that, can we?
Posted
12/20/2003 03:00:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Friday, December 19, 2003
Posted
12/19/2003 12:35:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/19/2003 09:36:52 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process. The responsibility of the United States in this conflict is to eliminate weapons of mass destruction, to minimize the danger to our troops and to diminish the suffering of the Iraqi people.-- House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, California Democrat, in a statement in December 1998 supporting President Clinton's four-day bombing of Iraq.
Posted
12/19/2003 09:31:58 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/19/2003 09:16:49 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, December 18, 2003
Posted
12/18/2003 10:26:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/18/2003 05:14:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/18/2003 03:50:40 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Getting O'Donnell back became a necessity after Billy Volek suffered a lacerated spleen in the Titans' 28-26 victory over Buffalo on Sunday. Rookie Jason Gesser has been the only healthy quarterback, with Steve McNair nursing a cracked bone spur in his left ankle. The Titans had been working since Tuesday to reach a deal that would make O'Donnell happy and keep the team under the salary cap.Prior to serving as McNair's backup in Tennessee, O'Donnell is best known for his role as the Steelers' QB of the early to mid 1990s, when he led them to four playoff appearances and a Super Bowl appearance.
Posted
12/18/2003 03:44:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/18/2003 03:22:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
A look at this photograph I took of a Jewish school tells you a lot. Despite its almost block-length size there is no sign or name on the building, certainly no Hebrew letters or Jewish words of any kind to identify it as if it were a secret government installation or think tank. You would have no idea what it was except for a simple "College" written by one of the doors. When I stopped to take this picture, a barrel-chested man who looked like an expert in karate or krav maga, obviously a security guard, rushed out the door in seconds to see who I was, demanding to know what I was doing there. I had to repeat for him several times that I was Jew from California before he relaxed and asked me to please put away my camera. On second thought I'm not going to post the picture. Instead I will post this--the graffiti in the sidewalk all over the 13th Arrondisment where this school was located.Read the whole thing.
Posted
12/18/2003 03:02:54 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/18/2003 02:37:36 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, December 17, 2003
Posted
12/17/2003 11:19:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/17/2003 10:55:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
I was at a media-heavy Manhattan dinner party that vividly dramatized the pre-spider hole mood. The guests -- mostly Democrats, with a smattering of moderate Republicans -- were unanimously kissing off Bush. It had been a particularly obnoxious week for a crowd that favors a more metrosexual approach to foreign relations..."A more metrosexual approach to foreign relations"? That's a staggeringly silly sentence--and Brown's attitude throughout this piece (much like Maureen Dowd's tone) is so 1990s in its lack of seriousness. But wait--she's just getting started! "Good riddance" may not be a particularly eloquent thing for Bush to say about Saddam -- but comic-strip heroes don't have to be eloquent. In his interview with Diane Sawyer, Bush was like a guy in a sports bar, not much inclined to big-think. Dirty Harry doesn't talk much, and always in words of one syllable, but while the police commissioner is still fretting about getting a proper search warrant Harry has already offed the bad guy with his great big pistol.But we didn't "off" Hussein--he's still alive, and no matter what his fate is, it will be more merciful than those that he put--feet first--into the shredder. And as far as Bush being "a guy in a sports bar, not much inclined to big-think", maybe Brown should read the recent article by Jonathan Rauch, which portrays Bush as nothing less than a latter day FDR. Brown ends, astonishingly, with Hillary Clinton as staunch cold warrior (and die-hard American ally) Margaret Thatcher: Planted solidly behind the lectern with only intermittent reference to her notes [Hillary] exuded the sense of a well-filled mind and life. Maybe not yet a credible commander-in-chief but at least a Democratic Major Barbara. Distantly one could hear the voice of Maggie Thatcher during the Gulf War in 1990, commanding Bush 41 not to "go wobbly." She will wait this one out. Self-discipline, not self-doubt.If Hillary had commanded her husband not to go wobbily, Al Gore would be far more likely to be president today, and either way, Bill Clinton would have gotten the glory (not the least of which would have come from Brown herself) that Bush is receiving from the American people--largely by cleaning up the messes in the Middle East that Clinton (Bill, not Hillary) ignored. Brown, and her cocktail party coterie, "mostly Democrats, with a smattering of moderate Republicans"--in other words, RINOs--favor "a more metrosexual approach to foreign relations". Unfortunately, out in the real world, Saddam, al Qaida, the PLO and other terrorists rarely reciprocate such niceties. And Bush, (whose campaign slogan against would-be metrosexual Howard Dean could be, as James Lileks recently wrote, "He doesn't moisturize. He doesn't tweeze. And he never had a pedicure"), seems to get that. Which explains the title of Brown's cri de coeur.
Posted
12/17/2003 10:26:04 PM
by Edward Driscoll
[Brazile] said the comments of Mrs. Albright and Mr. Dean and Mr. McDermott have "no place in our dialogue on this very serious issue. I think most Americans have some lingering doubts about what happened on September 11, but until the commission and Congress completes its investigation, I think it best if people hold these views to themselves. But because we don't yet have a nominee, it's all out in the open."And having all these Oliver Stone and X-File conspiracy theories risks, as one unnamed Democrat is quoted as saying, the party drifting out of the "mainstream." UPDATE: Heh.
Posted
12/17/2003 05:57:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/17/2003 04:46:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/17/2003 04:42:04 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/17/2003 04:11:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/17/2003 02:31:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/17/2003 02:17:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/17/2003 01:34:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/17/2003 01:27:30 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/17/2003 01:21:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
There was a revealing moment on MSNBC the other night. Chris Matthews asked Dr. Dean whether Osama bin Laden should be tried in an American court or at The Hague. "I don't think it makes a lot of difference," said the governor airily. Mr. Matthews pressed once more. "It doesn't make a lot of difference to me," he said again. Some of us think what's left of Osama is already hard enough to scrape off the cave floor and put in a matchbox, never mind fly to the Netherlands. But, just for the sake of argument, his bloodiest crime was committed on American soil; American courts, unlike the international ones, would have the option of the death penalty. But Gov. Dean couldn't have been less interested. So how about Saddam? The Hague "suits me fine," he said, the very model of ennui. Saddam? Osama? Whatever, dude. So what does get the Dean juices going? A few days later, the governor was on CNN and Judy Woodruff asked him about his admission that he'd left the Episcopal Church and become a Congregationalist because "I had a big fight with a local Episcopal church over the bike path." I hasten to add that, in contrast to current Anglican controversies over gay marriage in British Columbia and gay bishops in New Hampshire, this does not appear to have been a gay bike path: its orientation was not an issue; it would seem to be a rare example of a non-gay controversy in the Anglican Communion. But nevertheless it provoked Howard into "a big fight." "I was fighting to have public access to the waterfront, and we were fighting very hard in the citizens group," he told Judy Woodruff. Fighting, fighting, fighting. And that's our pugnacious little Democrat. On Osama bin Laden, he's Mister Insouciant. But he gets mad about bike paths. Destroy the World Trade Center and he's languid and laconic and blasé. Obstruct plans to convert the ravaged site into a memorial bike path and he'll hunt you down wherever you are.That's just a taste--read the whole thing. I think a meme was born today. UPDATE: Charles Johnson is not happy: Being a cyclist, however, and a member of the Bike-Path Right, I have to say that I'm mortally offended by Steyn's heinous conflation of cycling with the Dean campaign. I hereby declare a fat-tire-wa on Steyn's narrow Canadian tuchis. Bike paths aren't just for angry dwarves.Actually, I think he'll get over it. Charles has a pretty good handlebar on things. Tuesday, December 16, 2003
Posted
12/16/2003 06:44:49 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/16/2003 06:10:07 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/16/2003 06:09:10 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Remember, this is the same Howard Dean (unless he has an equally evil twin) who, a week ago, was using the Bush administration's "failure to catch Saddam or bin Laden" to score political points from the incredibly addled Deaniacs. Suddenly, he's trying to argue that capturing Saddam is no big deal. In all the years I've been following politics I don't believe I have ever seen a more blatant case of the old switcheroo.And Andrew Sullivan fisks the recent speeches by Dean, and Hillary, to boot.
Posted
12/16/2003 12:18:50 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Call me sentimental. But when Sherman brought a wheelchair-bound U.S. soldier -- who had served in Iraq and was in San Diego to watch the Pack's win over the Chargers -- into the locker room after the game ... and then gave him the game ball ... well, on the day Saddam Hussein was captured, no coach made a better call.And that's rather classy of King to write, as well.
Posted
12/16/2003 12:08:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Old standards of sportsmanship have been dying for a long time. Ages ago it was considered cool for a player scoring a touchdown to flip the ball nonchalantly to the ground and run, head down, off the field. Then came ball spins and other tricks, dancing, prancing and in-your-face taunting. The sublime, indeed, had turned ridiculous. After the [Terrell Owens Sharpie incident], NFL commissioner Paul Tagliabue sent a memo around the league clarifying that if a player has objects that are not part of the uniform on the field or sideline he will be given an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty. Everyone knew it also would mean a fine, something Owens escaped because no one had anticipated a player being quite so boorish.I agree. I don't necessarily want to return to the old days of coolly flipping the ball to the ref after a score, but I think there's a balance--I don't want to see the NFL become the XFL, either. UPDATE: Don't hold your breath, sports fans. Horn will be fined $30,000 by the NFL. No suspension planned.
Posted
12/16/2003 11:04:31 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/16/2003 10:59:39 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Monday, December 15, 2003
Posted
12/15/2003 04:06:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/15/2003 03:22:48 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/15/2003 03:12:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/15/2003 03:05:53 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/15/2003 03:02:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/15/2003 02:40:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Frustrated with the lack of domestic support, left-leaning website MoveOn.org has apparently been reaching beyond American borders to generate cash revenue over the internet! The provocative international fundraising strategy threatens to embroil the presidential candidacies of General Wesley Clark and former Vermont Governor Howard Dean. Both men are named on international fundraising websites suggesting donations to MoveOn.org.As usual, Drudge signs off with "Developing..."
Posted
12/15/2003 02:24:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/15/2003 02:15:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The Angry Left is America's equivalent of the Palestinians: a self-destructive political movement based on nothing but a collection of grievances rooted in a falsified, self-justifying history. These grievances so distort their view of the world that they lose the capacity for ordinary moral judgment and cannot understand something as simple as that the fall of a genocidal tyrant is a good thing.Or it all could be because of Colin Powell's prostate, as angy leftist Eric Alterman suggests...
Posted
12/15/2003 02:04:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/15/2003 03:14:06 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/15/2003 02:57:50 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/15/2003 02:53:29 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/15/2003 02:45:32 AM
by Edward Driscoll
I’ve read all the nutball far-left sites worrying about the worrisome worries – does this help Dub? Was it all faked? Surely America will see that the man paraded before the cameras was a soy-based simulacrum cooked up in the Halliburton labs? It’s amusing to troll the fevered swamps, but nothing they say matters in the end. The history texts will note that Baghdad fell on this date, Saddam was captured on that date, and the events between the two events will fill up a paragraph at best. Cruel but true. This was a big event, but there are bigger events to come. We live in an age where we’re always waiting for the other shoe to drop. And drop it does. And drop again it will.Exactly.
Posted
12/15/2003 02:15:04 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, December 14, 2003
Posted
12/14/2003 07:23:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
No Democrat is running for president as a little ray of sunshine, but John Kerry used the occasion Sunday morning to tell Fox News that although the capture was good, the administration still has not done enough about AIDS. Can someone that tone-deaf govern? Howard Dean was more gracious than he was when Hussein fled Baghdad. Then Dean said 'I suppose' that Hussein's removal was a good thing. The capture was the third element in last week's trifecta for George W. Bush, coming after Al Gore strengthened the candidacy of Bush's preferred opponent and the Dow passed 10,000. But perhaps Sunday's euphoria among the majority of next November's voters will cause Democrats to pause on their double-time march toward nominating the one serious candidate of whom it can be indisputably said that, were he president, Hussein would still be a president too.
Posted
12/14/2003 03:55:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Mr. Rubaie said: "One thing which is very important is that this man had with him underground when they arrested him two AK-47's and did not shoot one bullet. I told him, `You keep on saying that you are a brave man and a proud Arab.' I said, `When they arrested you why didn't you shoot one bullet? You are a coward.' "And he started to use very colorful language. Basically, he used all his French." Mr. Rubaie added: "I was so angry because this guy has caused so much damage. He has ruined the whole country. He has ruined 25 million people. "And I have to confess that the last word was for me: I was the last to leave the room and I said, `May God curse you. Tell me, when are you going to be accountable to God and the day of judgment? What are you going to tell Him about Halabja and the mass graves, the Iran-Iraq war, thousands and thousands executed? What are you going to tell God?' He was exercising his French language."I'll bet the French government used some rather colorful language themselves today as well.
Posted
12/14/2003 03:11:08 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/14/2003 01:28:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
This event must, of course, come as a terrible blow to many ordinary Arabs, who have been fed for years on the possibility that Saddam might be the next Caliph. He wasn't deposed by Arabs; he didn't put up a fight; he is no martyr either - just a coward in a miserable little hole. The point of this is not to humiliate Arabs, of course. But it is to attempt to break the mass delusions that have both kept other dictators in power and prevented progress in the Arab world. Taking Saddam alive - and giving him all the dignity of a bedraggled hobo - is about as big a propaganda victory as the forces against terror can hope to accomplish.Be sure to also read the post below about the Telegraph's discovery of a document that they claim proves a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda.
Posted
12/14/2003 01:23:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/14/2003 01:06:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/14/2003 12:58:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
All the journalists and politicians, they are always embarrassed to feel joy when something like this happens. They fear it will show a lack of understanding that history is a heavy and ponderous thing, a big tragedy machine, and all progress is illusory. Celebrating a military triumph--and this was among other things a military triumph--seems to them tantamount to Kiplingism, quaintly ignorant and unhelpfully nationalistic. That's why everyone on TV today is furrowing his brow. They know joy is the wrong thing to be feeling. It's unsophisticated. But normal people don't have to be sophisticated. They can be normal. And happy. And say what normal Americans say when something great in history happens. 'Thanks, God. Thanks a lot.'Thanks, God.
Posted
12/14/2003 12:36:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/14/2003 12:28:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/14/2003 12:08:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/14/2003 12:04:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
We took Saddam Hussein alive, and, in doing this, we have done a great deal more than simply knock down a statue of a dictator -- we have vanquished a collective nightmare. We have turned the light on a bogey-man, and revealed him to be a broken old man, hiding fearfully in a six by eight hole. We can see now how foolish we were to regret not rubbing him out that first night, when we dropped the bunker-piercing bomb on what we had been told was his hide-out. Had we pulverized him then, he might well have returned to claim a permanent place in the Iraqi imagination, like a kind of Mesopotamian Freddy Krueger. But, luckily, we missed him, and now we can see that there was a providence in our failure -- as so often there is in our ordinary lives as well. That is the problem of living through history, rather than reading about it when it is over. What at first appears a triumph may be just a prelude to disaster; what at first seems a failure may prove to be merely a necessary step toward a final success. The capture of Saddam Hussein may not prove to be the turning point when, decades from now, we look back on this period; but, for right now, it certainly feels like it.I wonder if Saddam can be coerced (by any means necessary, as far as I'm concerned), to issue a final "surrender, lay down your arms" speech to the remaining pro-Baathist troops still fighting. I wonder how many of them will listen.
Posted
12/14/2003 11:49:05 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/14/2003 11:17:05 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
12/14/2003 02:49:24 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |