| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, January 10, 2004
Posted
1/10/2004 11:55:36 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/10/2004 11:52:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/10/2004 03:36:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/10/2004 03:20:09 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/10/2004 12:45:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/10/2004 11:17:24 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/10/2004 11:07:38 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Friday, January 09, 2004
Posted
1/9/2004 09:47:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/9/2004 09:40:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/9/2004 09:13:07 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/9/2004 03:33:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/9/2004 02:35:25 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/9/2004 02:25:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
WORST COLUMNIST OF THE YEAR: Maureen Dowd, New York Times This one was a no-brainer, and I mean the pun in all seriousness. No one does less with the largest opinion platform in American than Dowd. Her vacuity is legendary, but 2003 was a banner year even by her standards. In addition to weaving her incessant Bush-hating pop culture analogies every single week, this year she also managed to (among other things) deride Clarence Thomas as an affirmative action baby and call into question her own veracity by altering a quote by President Bush. This Op-Eddy is well deserved. Runner Up: Derrick Z. Jackson, Boston Globe I can't tell you how many times I've been appalled by the divisive racial rhetoric Jackson uses in his columns. He makes Bob Herbert look absolutely tame by comparison. I suppose its liberal white guilt that causes the editors at the Globe to keep publishing Jackson's weekly rants telling the Globe's readers that America is just one big Southern plantation, circa 1850. It's one thing to make serious arguments about racial injustice and inequality in America - both of which certainly still exist to a degree in our society - and something altogether different to declare that there is a "caste system" in America, as Jackson did earlier this year. If you want thoughtful liberal commentary on race in America skip Jackson and read Clarence Page or Leonard Pitts, Jr.Spot-on. And it's tough to argue with their lifetime achievement award.
Posted
1/9/2004 02:12:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
So there it sits, just across the bay, tempting and even tormenting Walsh -- the one almost-workable opportunity for him to return to the sidelines. Walsh watches Bill Parcells return and take Dallas to the playoffs in his first season, at 62. He watches Joe Gibbs return like George Washington from the dead to Washington at 63. He watches Dick Vermeil commit at 67 to another season in Kansas City. Walsh belongs to a generation of coaches who often retired too early mostly because society told them it was time to. He has discovered what most do -- that gardening and golfing can't begin to measure up to the grueling joy of coaching. They all need a break and they almost all realize they need coaching. No one ever has been better than Walsh at knowing and utilizing talent on offense and defense. Not Lombardi. Not Landry. Not anybody. What a waste it seems to be for Walsh to be watching so many others return.Of course, if not this season, maybe next. And maybe not with the Raiders. But it's possible--if remote--that the final chapter of Bill Walsh's career as a coach hasn't been written yet.
Posted
1/9/2004 01:09:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/9/2004 12:04:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/9/2004 12:03:21 PM
by Edward Driscoll
It's bad enough that I have to deal with all sorts of obstacles (incompetence, lack of parts, low manning, managerial shenanigans) to keep these pieces of s*** maintained without having some half-literate loser with a chip and a SAM on his shoulder adding to the misery.(PG-13 version available on the Sarge's blog.) Thursday, January 08, 2004
Posted
1/8/2004 11:01:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/8/2004 10:05:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/8/2004 07:13:28 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Indianapolis Colts coach Jim Mora smiles while being booed by Philadelphia Eagles fans after calling for a review of the Eagles' first touchdown which came in the fourth quarter, Sunday, Nov. 21, 1999, in Philadelphia. The Atlanta Falcons have reached agreement to hire now San Francisco defensive coordinator Mora as the team's head coach, a source said Thursday night, Jan. 8, 2004.On the other hand, the younger Jim Mora has never uttered, "playoffs...PLAYOFFS??!!" as his dad once did near the end of the season he was fired by the Colts, thus ensuring himself television immortality, as that clip is shown at least once every year on ESPN during the post-season.
Posted
1/8/2004 02:49:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/8/2004 02:31:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Sitting in a coffee shop with our three pre-teenage children just blocks from Ford's Theater, where we had just heard a presentation on Booth's assassination of President Lincoln, our nine-year-old daughter commented, "That man made it sound like the bad guy was the good guy and the good guy was the bad guy." The bad guy turned good guy would of course be John Wilkes Booth, the most notorious assassin in American history. In the revisionist history now officially on display at Ford's Theater, Booth's prophecy appears to be coming true, "The world may censure me for what I am about to do, but I am sure posterity will justify me."What sort of federal park ranger justifies the killing of his boss? "Our ranger said quite emphatically that there were things Lincoln never should have done, but he never came close to saying anything like this about Booth's actions", Hibbs writes. "Lincoln is thus brought low yet again in Ford's Theater, not this time by an assassin's bullet but by vulgar revisionist history. Ford's Theater, it seems, is now the house that Booth built".
Posted
1/8/2004 12:46:29 PM
by Edward Driscoll
By the way, I don't say this because I feel a passionate need to defend George Bush. I would make the exact same points if Al Gore were president. I would make the exact same points if anybody running for the Democratic nomination were president. This has nothing to do with partisanship. It has to do with the fact that such comparisons are slanderous to the United States and historical truth and amount to Holocaust denial. When you say that anything George Bush has done is akin to what Hitler did, you make the Holocaust into nothing more than an example of partisan excess. Tax cuts are not genocide, as so many Democrats have suggested over the years. (For example,. during the Contract with America debate, Charles Rangel complained that "Hitler wasn't even talking about doing these things" that were in the Contract with America. In other words, the Contract with America was in some way worse than what Hitler did. At the end of the day, that is Holocaust denial.) "Darn those Republicans" does not equal "Darn those Nazis." The Patriot Act is not the final solution. The handful of men in Guantanamo may not all be guilty of terrorism, but it's more than reasonable to assume they are. And no matter how you try to contort it, Gitmo is not the same thing as Auschwitz or Dachau. There are no children there. You don't get carted off to Cuba and gassed if you criticize the president or if you are one-quarter Muslim. And, inversely, there was no reasonable justification for throwing the Jews and the Gypsies and all the others into the death camps. The Jews weren't terrorists or members of a terrorist organization. To say that the men in Guantanamo — or any of the Muslims being politely interviewed by appointment — are akin to the Jews of Germany is to trivialize the experiences of the millions who were slaughtered. Even if you think Muslims are being unfairly inconvenienced, when you say they are the Jews of Nazified America you are in essence saying the worst crime of the Holocaust was to unfairly inconvenience the Jews.Maybe Godwin's Law should really be law.
Posted
1/8/2004 12:34:15 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/8/2004 12:27:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, January 07, 2004
Posted
1/7/2004 11:49:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/7/2004 11:34:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Most significant, of course, is the large drop. One could hypothesize the opposition threw everything they had into a 'Tet Offensive'. Like the Viet-Cong before them, they lost; unlike the Viet-Cong there is no regular army from a neighboring country, armed and funded by a super-power, to take their place. This is only a supposition; one cannot state this with any confidence of being correct until there are a few more months of data to back it up. One could alternatively hypothesize the enemy is quietly regrouping after their offensive. I do not believe this, but it is certainly possible.To really put Amon's stats into perspective, include this with them.
Posted
1/7/2004 08:01:18 PM
by Edward Driscoll
'We control matter because we control the mind. Reality is inside the skull. You will learn by degrees, Winston. There is nothing that we could not do. Invisibility, levitation -- anything. I could float off this floor like a soap bubble if I wish to. I do not wish to, because the Party does not wish it. You must get rid of those nineteenth-century ideas about the laws of Nature. We make the laws of Nature.' 'But you do not! You are not even masters of this planet. What about Eurasia and Eastasia? You have not conquered them yet.' 'Unimportant. We shall conquer them when it suits us. And if we did not, what difference would it make? We can shut them out of existence. Oceania is the world.' 'But the world itself is only a speck of dust. And man is tiny helpless! How long has he been in existence? For millions of years the earth was uninhabited.' 'Nonsense. The earth is as old as we are, no older. How could it be older? Nothing exists except through human consciousness.' 'But the rocks are full of the bones of extinct animals -- mammoths and mastodons and enormous reptiles which lived here long before man was ever heard of.' 'Have you ever seen those bones, Winston? Of course not. Nineteenth-century biologists invented them. Before man there was nothing. After man, if he could come to an end, there would be nothing. Outside man there is nothing.' 'But the whole universe is outside us. Look at the stars! Some of them are a million light-years away. They are out of our reach for ever.' 'What are the stars?' said O'Brien indifferently. 'They are bits of fire a few kilometres away. We could reach them if we wanted to. Or we could blot them out. The earth is the centre of the universe. The sun and the stars go round it.' Winston made another convulsive movement. This time he did not say anything. O'Brien continued as though answering a spoken objection: 'For certain purposes, of course, that is not true. When we navigate the ocean, or when we predict an eclipse, we often find it convenient to assume that the earth goes round the sun and that the stars are millions upon millions of kilometres away. But what of it? Do you suppose it is beyond us to produce a dual system of astronomy? The stars can be near or distant, according as we need them. Do you suppose our mathematicians are unequal to that? Have you forgotten doublethink?'Despite the fact that Orwell intended 1984 as a warning, much more than an attempt at predicting the future, it seems like a lot of intellectuals took that passage to heart, as Steven Den Beste demonstrates in a tremendous post, apparently the first of a two part series: The academics in non-rigorous fields were not even needed any longer to help bridge the gap between the scientists and laymen. In 1991, John Brockman wrote:Be sure to read what happens next, when in 1991, computer programmer Chip Morningstar was invited to give a speech at a two-day "interdisciplinary" Second International Conference on Cyberspace. UPDATE: Whoops--Steven emailed me to inform me that his post is actually the second of what he believes will be a four-part series. Here's the first part.In the past few years, the playing field of American intellectual life has shifted, and the traditional intellectual has become increasingly marginalized. A 1950s education in Freud, Marx, and modernism is not a sufficient qualification for a thinking person in the 1990s. Indeed, the traditional American intellectuals are, in a sense, increasingly reactionary, and quite often proudly (and perversely) ignorant of many of the truly significant intellectual accomplishments of our time. Their culture, which dismisses science, is often nonempirical. It uses its own jargon and washes its own laundry. It is chiefly characterized by comment on comments, the swelling spiral of commentary eventually reaching the point where the real world gets lost. In 1959 C.P. Snow published a book titled The Two Cultures. On the one hand, there were the literary intellectuals; on the other, the scientists. He noted with incredulity that during the 1930s the literary intellectuals, while no one was looking, took to referring to themselves as "the intellectuals," as though there were no others. This new definition by the "men of letters" excluded scientists such as the astronomer Edwin Hubble, the mathematician John von Neumann, the cyberneticist Norbert Wiener, and the physicists Albert Einstein, Niels Bohr, and Werner Heisenberg.But what Snow eventually referred to as a "third culture" began to appear, though not exactly in the way he expected. Scientists and other technical people began to reach out directly to the laymen, to explain what they were doing and why and what significance it had, and why it was so fascinating. (Blush, people like me.)Scientific topics receiving prominent play in newspapers and magazines over the past several years include molecular biology, artificial intelligence, artificial life, chaos theory, massive parallelism, neural nets, the inflationary universe, fractals, complex adaptive systems, superstrings, biodiversity, nanotechnology, the human genome, expert systems, punctuated equilibrium, cellular automata, fuzzy logic, space biospheres, the Gaia hypothesis, virtual reality, cyberspace, and teraflop machines. Among others. There is no canon or accredited list of acceptable ideas. The strength of the third culture is precisely that it can tolerate disagreements about which ideas are to be taken seriously. Unlike previous intellectual pursuits, the achievements of the third culture are not the marginal disputes of a quarrelsome mandarin class: they will affect the lives of everybody on the planet.But no one was paying comparable attention to the kind of stuff that the self-styled intellectuals were doing. The worst thing you can do to a proud man is to ignore him; and increasingly the "men of letters" found themselves being ignored or treated as curiosities. Increasingly isolated, frustrated, useless on a practical level, and with prestige declining, they became intellectually inbred. Since no one else respected them, they "respected" each other and decided no one else's opinion really mattered. The swelling spiral of comment-on-comment continued, divorced from reality. Over the course of maybe thirty years, a form of intellectual "pseudoscience" developed.
Posted
1/7/2004 05:11:49 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/7/2004 03:37:29 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, January 06, 2004
Posted
1/6/2004 09:57:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/6/2004 02:27:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/6/2004 02:06:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/6/2004 12:29:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/6/2004 11:58:10 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/6/2004 11:35:30 AM
by Edward Driscoll
The plane is Delta flight 043. It left Paris at 11:20 a.m. and is scheduled to land at 2:30 p.m. The flight is said to be of interest because of a potential terrorism suspect on board, according to WLWT. According to reports, a woman was removed from the flight before it took off from Paris because she had an electronic device that was causing some suspicion. The plane will be held in an area away from the terminal when it lands. Passengers will be re-screened as a precaution when the plane lands in Cincinnati, WLWT reported. NBC news is reporting that officials want to speak with 14 people on board. Additional details are forthcoming.Here are a few more details. UPDATE: Here's the page that Matt Drudge links to. It may open very slowly, probably because Matt's traffic is blowing out its server. But it lists flight 043 as an Air France flight, not Delta. Which makes sense. As Mark Steyn wrote, "It's interesting that, during the recent security scares, the terrorists seem to have been targeting BA and Air France. They seem to reckon they've a better chance of pulling something on a non-US airline. I hope that's not true, and that when the next shoebomber bends down to light his sock, he'll find himself sitting next to some gung-ho Brit rather than the 'peace and solidarity' type." UPDATE (12:01 PM): Sounds like a false alarm. The Channel Cincinnati.com page I linked to above has been updated to include these details: The fighter jets were called off before the plane, Delta flight 043, landed. It left Paris at 11:20 a.m. and was scheduled to land at about 3:20 p.m., WLWT Eyewitness News 5 reported. According to reports, a woman was removed from the flight before it took off from Paris Charles de Gaulle International Airport because she had a coat with wires protruding from it. The coat turned out to be a motorcycle jacket that works like an electric blanket, and the woman was booked onto a later flight, WLWT reported. U.S. officials were notified after the woman was removed "out of an abundance of caution," a U.S. official said. The officials said several flights have been escorted in recent months as a precaution. The plane will be held in an area away from the terminal when it lands, and passengers will be re-screened as a precaution when the plane lands in Cincinnati, WLWT reported.But one question remains: why would you wear a leather jacket (or any jacket), with wires protruding from it on an airline flight?? Monday, January 05, 2004
Posted
1/5/2004 10:52:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/5/2004 06:13:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/5/2004 05:03:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/5/2004 04:49:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/5/2004 03:06:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/5/2004 12:35:44 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, January 04, 2004
Posted
1/4/2004 11:18:56 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/4/2004 10:45:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Up to the moment he popped up out of the spider-hole, the international jet-set's line was that deplorable as Saddam's rule might be — gassing Kurds, feeding folks feet-first into industrial shredders, etc. — it was strictly an internal matter for the Iraqi people and other countries had no business interfering. The minute the old boy was in U.S. custody, the international jet-set's revised position was that gassing Kurds, feeding folks into industrial shredders and so forth were crimes against the whole world and certainly not a matter for the Iraqi people. Instead, we need a (drum roll, please) U.N.-mandated international tribunal."This is what the Zionist neo-cons would call chutzpah", Mark Steyn adds. Heh.
Posted
1/4/2004 09:17:49 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/4/2004 03:22:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/4/2004 03:09:04 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/4/2004 01:32:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The love affair with Communism among American academics isn't over, though at many institutions it has migrated into the polysyllabic Leftism of the terminally disaffected.Read the whole thing. UPDATE: I don't know which is worse--the Hiss chair or the American Historical Association honoring the left's favorite ex-Klansman.
Posted
1/4/2004 01:20:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/4/2004 12:54:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
![]()
Home |