| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, January 24, 2004
Posted
1/24/2004 02:53:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Friday, January 23, 2004
Posted
1/23/2004 09:15:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/23/2004 05:44:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/23/2004 04:46:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/23/2004 04:30:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/23/2004 03:52:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/23/2004 11:09:25 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/23/2004 10:37:06 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, January 22, 2004
Posted
1/22/2004 06:54:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/22/2004 06:37:21 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/22/2004 05:50:16 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/22/2004 05:13:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/22/2004 04:31:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/22/2004 04:23:07 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/22/2004 03:31:14 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/22/2004 02:40:14 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/22/2004 11:23:16 AM
by Edward Driscoll
This last week, unfortunately for his electoral prospects, Howard Dean revealed the stuff that he was made up and did so in a matter of minutes; and -- fairly or unfairly -- many of those who watched his performance found themselves convinced that they now knew what Governor Dean would act like in a moment of genuine national crisis, and were not assured by the insight that had been inadvertently given them. We should keep this in mind whenever we reflect on the seemingly irrational method by which we as a people select the man to fill the most important office in the world. For the real purpose behind the superficially bizarre rituals of an American election -- caucuses, primaries, televised debates, concession speeches -- is not to provide an exercise in democracy; it is to test the inner resources and character of the candidates, and to do this by exposing them to a grueling series of artificially induced crises that simulate those that he will ultimately have to face as president. The American electoral process is, in a way, like the simulated testing done by the manufacturers of automobile tires -- we want to know which ones are reliable before we put them on our cars, rather than afterwards, and that is why the American people tend to respond so harshly to those candidates who fail to make the grade during this our national period of candidate testing. Iowa was Dean's first crisis -- and he blew it; and in doing so he lost far more than the Iowa caucus: he lost the reputation as a man who could be trusted to act calmly and rationally in the midst of adversity. And that is a lesson that the American people will not quickly forget. We do not live in a world where we can afford to.What happens next? Take it away, Mark Steyn.
Posted
1/22/2004 10:48:20 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/22/2004 01:07:23 AM
by Edward Driscoll
How come newspapers have science writers who know some science, and food writers who know something about food, and best of all an M.D. like the New York Times's Lawrence Altman who can write about medicine with authority? But when it comes to war and terror, anybody and everybody is sent to cover the story with a minimal knowledge of the subject of their assignment. So what do we get 'human-interest' stories and dumb 'gotcha' questions at headquarters press briefings.You know, the rudiments of journalism can be learned very quickly, not to mention, on the job. TV shows frequently employ ex-generals when there's a major conflict. Why can't newspapers hire ex- or even currently serving military men as well? You know...like these folks. Or these. Or this fellow? Just a thought. Wednesday, January 21, 2004
Posted
1/21/2004 10:53:28 PM
by Edward Driscoll
On Jan. 18, the National Taxpayer Advocate, Nina E. Olson, sent a report to Congress that identified "sole proprietor tax noncompliance" as one of the "top two" problems faced by taxpayers. Ms. Olson then went on to recommend that "Congress enact a withholding requirement on payments to independent categories of nonwage workers." In other words, the "taxpayer advocate," whose job description, in part, is to protect small business from being taxed too much, is saying small businesses need to be taxed more and also suffer an increased paperwork and compliance burden.Richard W. Rahn, the author of the piece, is calling for Olsen to be immediately removed, because she doesn't understand her job. I couldn't agree more. When I was a Registered Investment Advisor in the mid-1990s, it not only seemed like the paperwork increased every year--it did. And the fastest way to screw up a recovery is to ask small business to pay more taxes and do more paperwork. Robert Novak once wrote that Republicans were put on Earth to cut taxes. Olsen needs to get with the program.
Posted
1/21/2004 05:41:04 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Dallas Cowboys assistant head coach Sean Payton never received a contract offer to become the Oakland Raiders next head, and on Wednesday the Cowboys announced that Payton will remain with the organization.As Fanball.com writes: Only in Oakland. Not only was Payton the only candidate to interview twice with Al Davis, but he fit the Al Davis profile for a new head coach almost perfectly. Apparently, the enigmatic Davis either reversed course at some point or negotiations with Payton's camp did not proceed well. Either way, we look forward to the fallout from this fiasco, including where Davis turns next to fill the last remaining coaching vacancy.Of course, as Skip Bayless noted a little while ago, Bill Walsh--tanned, rested, and ready... UPDATE: Davis gave a lengthy press conference earlier today.
Posted
1/21/2004 04:15:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/21/2004 03:46:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/21/2004 02:38:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Reading between the lines, you just know that Howard Dean really digs the Hamas.This photo of Dean dancing up a storm does little to get me to change my mind. Incidentally, because Monday and Tuesday were rather hectic here at EdDriscoll.com HQ, I never got a chance to link to Dean's Iowa meltdown speech. So, here's an audio clip. Watch for samples of Dean's YEAAAAARGH!!!! scream to appear in recordings everywhere. UPDATE: Oops--I hadn't seen any photographic coverage of Dean in action during his rant. Now it all makes sense!
Posted
1/21/2004 02:33:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Ah, but Mr. Klug is probably saying, that can change. Really? Well, I suppose anything can (and probably will) but right now my personal experience is to the contrary. I’m not sure the extent Mr. Klug likes to do research in the street, as they say, but as a novelist I find it helpful. On my recent trip to France to gain background for my next book, I was taken to Montfermeil, one of the infamous suburban cité ringing Paris where the Moslem immigrants live. These are the housing projects where the police dare not go, even to prevent gang rapes, and where the obscenity “Nique ta mere, juif!” is scrawled on the walls. (Note it says “juif”—Jew—not “sioniste”—Zionist). One of the interesting (though not surprising) things in this horrible and sad environment is the ubiquity of satellite dishes. They are tuned, of course, to Al Jazeera, but more often, I was told, to Egyptian television, where one of the most popular shows is the serial version of “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.” Now that’s a prescription for ethnic comity—millions of unemployed Moslems sitting in squalid apartments in Paris watching the famous racist libels of the Tsar’s secret service on television. Is that a “new” anti-Semitism? I guess that depends on what your definition of “new” is and finally—who cares? What matters is that it is there and that it is growing. What also matters is that this statistic--these “millions” of unemployed Moslems--is not much of an exaggeration. And their numbers are growing, without their views of Jews—or anyone else—changing. The French are only now trying to come to grips with this—and obviously are having great difficulty. In their defense, it’s not simple. In any case, those who “idealistically” advocate the Jews accept a binational state in the Holy Land ought to consider, putting it gently, what the outcome would be for them of sharing their society with a Palestinian culture in its present state. You might as well turn around and walk back into the gas chambers.Or as Charles Krauthammer succinctly wrote, almost two years ago, "In Europe, it is not very safe to be a Jew".
Posted
1/21/2004 01:38:08 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/21/2004 12:47:01 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, January 20, 2004
Posted
1/20/2004 11:19:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
"Martin Luther King fled the scene. He took to his heels and disappeared, leaving it to others to cope with the destructive forces he had helped to unleash. And I hope that well-meaning Negro leaders and individuals in the Negro community in Washington will now take a new look at this man who gets other people into trouble and then takes off like a scared rabbit." --Robert C. Byrd, Democratic Senator from West Virginia, by way of the Ku Klux Klan.Here's an audio clip of Byrd speaking the above quote. (It's about 48 seconds in, if you want to skip Rush Limbaugh's introduction.) Why is this man still in office? And why is he receiving an award from the American Historical Association? And check out this fawning tribute by the Wheeling, WV News-Register.
Posted
1/20/2004 10:04:38 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/20/2004 10:00:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
John Hawkins lists his favorite lines. Glenn Reynolds has lots of thoughts and links. Stephen Green Blogged it in real-time--by popular demand! "The Corner" Blogged it as well--start here, scroll up. Or start here, and scroll down!And follow everybody's links for a complete SOTU-palooza! UPDATE: And for those with ADD, Reason's "Hit & Run" Blog has condensed versions of the speech, and the Democrats' response.
Posted
1/20/2004 09:46:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/20/2004 03:32:59 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/20/2004 03:06:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/20/2004 02:47:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/20/2004 02:29:36 PM
by Edward Driscoll
They say, "Never attribute to malice that which can be explained by stupidity", but we seem to have gone beyond any possible stupidity now. Have we reached the point where we can assume there's a conspiracy to spread a big lie? And where we can safely dismiss the opinions of anyone who repeats it?We can't dismiss them--but fortunately, we can--and do--correct them.
Posted
1/20/2004 02:15:21 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Monday, January 19, 2004
Posted
1/19/2004 06:07:36 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/19/2004 04:41:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/19/2004 11:17:03 AM
by Edward Driscoll
The greatest scholar of the Islamic world, Bernard Lewis, has brilliantly explained the roots of Muslim rage. He traces that rage to the failure of Muslim societies to adapt to the modern world. The people of these societies remember that they were once rich and powerful and important. Now they lag far behind – and they do not understand why. Rather than look inward at their own faults and failings, they have sought scapegoats in the world beyond their borders. Can’t one see something similar at work in the mind of Michiko Kakutani? The brand of liberalism championed by her newspaper was once all-powerful in American cultural life. Over the past decade, that power has ebbed away – and since 9/11, the ebb has become a flood. The New York Times no longer decides what Americans will read and what Americans will think about what they read. Rather than look inward, they blame talk radio and the Internet and Fox TV. And when this ferocious reservoir of accumulated resentment encounters a new and contradictory idea – well it just boils over.If only for the ability to counterpunch, Glenn sensibly comments, "Every author should have a blog".
Posted
1/19/2004 01:14:14 AM
by Edward Driscoll
The 1947 Oscar-winner Gentleman’s Agreement strikes most contemporary observers as very tame, square Kazan. But, in a curious way, that’s the point. When you start watching and you realize it’s an issue movie “about” anti-semitism, you expect it to get ugly, to show us Jew-bashing in the schoolyard, and vile language about kikes. But it stays up the genteel end with dinner party embarrassments, restricted resort hotels, an understanding about the sort of person one sells one’s property to. Dorothy McGuire and her Connecticut friends aren’t bad people, but in their world, as much as on Johnny Friendly’s waterfront, people conform: they turn a blind eye to the Jew-disparaging joke, they discreetly avoid confronting the truth about the hotel’s admission policies, and, as Gregory Peck comes to understand, they’re the respectable face of what at the sharp end means pogroms and genocide. That’s what all those Hollywood and Broadway Communists did. They were the polite front of an ideology that led to mass murder, and they expected Kazan to honour their gentleman’s agreement. In those polite house parties Gregory Peck goes to in Kazan's movie, it’s rather boorish and tedious to become too exercised about anti-semitism. And likewise, at gatherings in the arts, it’s boorish and tedious to become too exercised about Communism – no matter how many faraway, foreign, unglamorous people it kills. Elia Kazan was on the right side of history. His enemies line up with the apologists for thugs and tyrants. Whose reputation would you bet on in the long run?If you haven't read it yet, Steyn's article on Dalton Trumbo makes an appropriate bookend.
Posted
1/19/2004 01:00:48 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/19/2004 12:53:21 AM
by Edward Driscoll
It's difficult to imagine such an article appearing in a liberal newspaper during Reagan's presidency. It's also hard to imagine a conservative celebrating Dr. King during his lifetime. But in America, political passions have a way of fading with time. Like Lincoln, both Reagan and Dr. King now belong to the ages (Reagan is still alive, but his mind is ravaged by Alzheimer's, and he has been out of the public eye for nearly a decade). The principle of racial equality is no longer controversial, and even most liberals admire Ronald Reagan, whether or not they agree with his policies. That ought to put today's political wars in some perspective. On Dr. King's birthday President Bush visited Atlanta and laid a wreath at his tomb. Shockingly, some 400 people protested, as if there were something wrong with an American president paying tribute to an American hero....Perhaps in another generation, when the Angry Left has cooled down, the New York Times will carry an op-ed piece exploring the philosophical kinship between Martin Luther King and George W. Bush. Just remember, you heard it here first.I won't hold my breath, but yes, it is entirely possible. And that alone is progress, I suppose. UPDATE TO THE UPDATE: Pejman Yousefzadeh quips, "I'd like to report that The New York Times editorial page has been hijacked. Because, quite frankly, that is the only way to explain the appearance of this piece.
Posted
1/19/2004 12:44:56 AM
by Edward Driscoll
I’ve never met a real social-welfare state leftist who could answer the following question without having to think real hard: "Aside from the murder and genocide, what exactly don’t you like about National Socialism?"Bruce Bartlett lists some of the reasons why leftists have had to "think real hard" about that question. Meanwhile, Suzanne Fields writes, "Mocking the horrors of the Holocaust has become a cottage industry in the dark corners of the anti-Semitic world, but who could have believed that in 60 years references to the Nazis would be played for laughs. An anti-Bush Web site parodies Time magazine's Person of the Year, pasting a swastika on the arm of an American soldier."
Posted
1/19/2004 12:34:16 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, January 18, 2004
Posted
1/18/2004 04:53:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
"I think it's inevitable that the over-the-airways broadcasters and, for that matter, many in cable either take a pass or reduce their coverage even more than we've seen in recent years," Rather told the Television Critics Association this weekend.So? It made perfect sense for the networks to cover the Republican and Democratic conventions back when they were the only game in town. But now there are endless alternatives. The conventions will be covered by CSPAN, simulcast over the 'Net, covered by Bloggers and other Web journalists, etc. Rather--and the networks--still don't get that the world no longer revolves around CBS, ABC and NBC.
Posted
1/18/2004 04:23:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/18/2004 01:33:41 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/18/2004 01:20:59 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/18/2004 12:52:35 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
1/18/2004 12:45:04 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |