| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, February 07, 2004
Posted
2/7/2004 09:47:04 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/7/2004 12:01:23 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Friday, February 06, 2004
Posted
2/6/2004 09:22:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/6/2004 02:36:49 PM
by Edward Driscoll
over 150 honorably discharged and many very highly decorated veterans testified to war crimes committed in Southeast Asia. These were not isolated incidents but crimes committed on a day-to-day basis with the full awareness of officers at all levels of command. . . . They relived the absolute horror of what this country, in a sense, made them do. They told stories that at times they had personally raped, cut off ears, cut off heads, taped wires from portable telephones to human genitals and turned up the power, cut off limbs, blown up bodies, randomly shot at civilians, razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan, shot cattle and dogs for fun, poisoned food stocks, and generally ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam in addition to the normal ravage of war, and the normal and very particular ravaging which is done by the applied bombing power of this country.As James Lileks and Hugh Hewitt have written, Kerry is eminently beatable. (Kerry's post-Vietnam record--and the record of the media in covering Vietnam vets in general, is available online in the latest issue of National Review, but a subscription is required.) UPDATE: Is Kerry actually planting his own phony hecklers in the audience?? ANOTHER UPDATE: Here's more on Kerry's life during the late-1960s and early 1970s. ONE MORE UPDATE: Robert Moran, vice president at Republican polling firm Fabrizio, McLaughlin & Associates, writes, "John Kerry should enjoy [his current] poll numbers while they last, because his free ride is about to end.
Posted
2/6/2004 02:19:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/6/2004 01:32:50 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/6/2004 01:29:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
They don't know John Kerry's record. They haven't examined it. This is a very vulnerable candidate on several issues. ... [H]e is the Olympic gold medalist, when it comes to special interest money. I also think that he is very vulnerable on the issues of national security. ...[I]f you look at his voting record, it is terrible as far as it comes to national defense and helping fund a good intelligence unit.Roger L. Simon adds: I don’t believe Kerry has done that much changing—that’s why I brought up Vietnam in the first place. The same man who could vote in favor of the War in Iraq and then vote months later not to fund our troops once we had won that war is the same person who kept changing his mind on Vietnam for what seem to be in retrospect at least partly opportunistic reasons. (By the way, I have much more respect for Dean—like me another draft dodger—whose views, though I disagree with them, are consistent in this area. I don’t even believe Kerry when he implies the War on Terror is puffed up. I’m sure he’d say something completely different in another circumstance.)Simon adds, "We live in serious times and this is, despite his fancy suits and seeming gravitas, a fundamentally unserious person. I don't trust him at the controls."
Posted
2/6/2004 12:09:59 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, February 05, 2004
Posted
2/5/2004 10:33:21 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/5/2004 10:15:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/5/2004 07:36:22 PM
by Edward Driscoll
First of all, until you've got more than 600,000 American bodies stacked up like cordwood, spare me the "more divided than ever before" talk. We have this phrase in political discourse which is very useful. It goes like this: "...since the end of the Civil War..." You can put it at the end or the beginning of almost any sentence to indicate that you are discussing trends that began after the War Between the States concluded. Because that period in American history is what you might call a statistical outlier. We were really divided then, what with all the shooting each other and stuff. Even in places where there was no shooting, we were very divided. The New York Draft Riots, for example, featured mobs of 50,000 ticked-off New Yorkers and Irish immigrants who burned big chunks of the city over three days and hanged a lot of black people from street lights. I know the Florida recount was a big deal and all, but let's get a little perspective. Second, I haven't looked at the survey data on this question since I was a policy gnome at the American Enterprise Institute, but it seems to me that one could make a persuasive argument that America was more deeply divided in, let's see: the 1780s, 1790s, 1840s, 1850s, 1860s, 1890s, 1920s, 1930s, 1960s, 1970s, and possibly the 1980s and 1990s. Now, it may be true, as Greenberg suggests, that we are now more evenly divided than at any time--possibly including the Civil War period. But evenly divided people can, and often do, settle their differences with Nerf bats or over checkers or even, don't you know, at the ballot box. Deeply divided people, on the other hand, are more likely to use guns, knives, and really pointy rocks to settle their differences. In other words, living in an evenly divided society is an interesting challenge politically, but not a really big problem, while living in a deeply divided society is cause for stocking up on bottled water and shotgun shells.Exactly.
Posted
2/5/2004 07:06:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
He's a tax-raising, free-spending, marriage ending, war crime alleging, missile defense opposing, North Korean appeasing, Soros-loving, cut-and-running Taxachusetts lefty whose voting record is, according to the gold standard of lefties, the Americans for Democratic Action, to the left of Teddy Kennedy? Do you mean that line of attack? I'm shocked that the Republicans might actually point out that the election of John Kerry would install the hardest left president in American history. I suppose we aren't supposed to mention the "cash and Kerry" stuff either? Or botox? Or anything about his dreary, endlessly self-serving rewrite of his statements about Vietnam (see below.) Dean excited the GOP because he was a noisy target. Kerry is quieter but much larger. Let the games begin.They already have. Saturday Night Live's writers need to start working on "Kerry After Dark" for next season's November 6th episode. It won't take much--merely a quick find-and-replace search with Word 2003. UPDATE: This isn't helping Kerry, either.
Posted
2/5/2004 06:34:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/5/2004 06:25:28 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/5/2004 05:13:32 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/5/2004 04:45:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/5/2004 04:23:48 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/5/2004 02:29:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/5/2004 02:20:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/5/2004 02:17:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/5/2004 02:05:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Wednesday, February 04, 2004
Posted
2/4/2004 11:06:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
What's the message here? John Kerry is best suited to lead us in the present war because he was a prominent opponant of the last one, which we lost. John Kerry led the fight to leave South Vietnam to the mercies of the North. John Kerry would rather lose a theater for the right reasons than win it for reasons the critics derided. Dress it up however you like, but that’s what it came down to; college students marched not against the Vietnamese war but the American participation in that conflict. Anyone fill the Mall in DC to protest the reeducation camps? Any Solidarity with the Boat People committees formed on campuses after the fall of the south? The privations of the vanquished South Vietnamese were an uncomfortable consequence of their goals – but of course it didn’t detract a jot from the nobility of the cause. I still remember the week we had a Vietnamese woman stay at our house - she was a Party member, a professional, and what did she bring back home for her kids? White paper. To draw on. A luxury item, that. If Kerry wants to bring this era back, he’s demonstrated that his branch of the party are the modern-day Bourbons. They have forgotten nothing and learned nothing. For them the great evil wasn’t communism, but America’s response to communism. And now the threat isn’t Islamic terrorism, but what we do to combat it. We act without French approval. We act after 170 UN resolutions instead of crafting a 171st which forbids us from acting. We deploy anti-missile defenses around the Korean peninsula instead of striking a deal to give them more food, more oil, more time."In short, we act as if we have a pair", says Lileks, something the left began to lose during LBJ's administration, when it didn't have the balls to fight for a clear-cut victory in Vietnam, and really lost when it nominated McGovern in '72. Be sure to check out the photo Lileks posted as well.
Posted
2/4/2004 09:47:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Very amusing moment today on Fresh Air--Terry Gross was interviewing Egyptian publisher and human rights activist Hisham Kassem. She noted that he had supported the Iraq War before it started, in the belief that it would bring reform not just to Iraq but the whole region, and she wondered if he'd reconsidered. He answered that he hadn't, that the war had in fact brought democracy to Iraq and was having a liberalizing effect throughout the Middle East. She asked for examples, which he proceeded to cite, saying there were really too many to go through in their entirety. Then, not knowing when she'd dug her grave deep enough, she asked if the Kay report had called the war into question. He answered that he didn't care about WMD nor think it was the primary cause of or justification for the war, that getting rid of the regime was sufficient unto itself. Her disappointment at the improved prospects for freedom in the Arab world was palpable. How have liberals worked themselves into such a perverse position?A couple of years ago, Jonah Goldberg dubbed it "hypocrophobia"--the crippling fear that many in the left have of being taken seriously.
Posted
2/4/2004 08:50:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/4/2004 07:44:28 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/4/2004 05:22:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Former front-runner Howard Dean sat out this week's primaries, but still managed to make news by ridiculing the FCC's plan to investigate MTV's halftime show at the Super Bowl. Dean pronounced the proposed investigation "silly." He explained that, as a doctor, a naked breast is "not exactly an unusual phenomenon for me." That's an interesting standard. Presumably a primetime exhibition of Janet Jackson having a full pelvic exam and pap smear would not be "exactly an unusual phenomenon" for Dean either. Let's just be grateful Dean's not a proctologist. Meanwhile, the rest of the country was not so copacetic about being flashed with what The New York Times called Janet Jackson's "middle-aged woman's breast." Janet Jackson said she decided to add "the reveal" following the final rehearsal, which I found pretty shocking. Not the reveal -- the fact that the number in question was actually rehearsed. Even CBS executives were enraged by MTV's halftime show, saying they could have gotten the identical show from National Geographic for a fraction of the price.Heh.
Posted
2/4/2004 03:51:58 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/4/2004 03:49:33 PM
by Edward Driscoll
![]() [T]he same people were trying to convince us in 1992 that Bill Clinton's draft-dodging was no big deal. Surely the Democrats don't think we're that stupid. . . . What a bunch of lying, hypocritical phonies.Hey, just think of it as the chickenhawk slur sexed up for an election year.
Posted
2/4/2004 03:06:10 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/4/2004 02:43:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
In other words, people who can't break tobacco's tenacious hold suddenly find that they can when the price of cigarettes goes up. Apparently, the free choice that is lost when you start smoking can be restored through taxation. Only the fleeced are truly free.Read the whole thing.
Posted
2/4/2004 01:58:56 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/4/2004 01:52:56 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/4/2004 01:37:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Later -- in 10 years, or in 60 -- it will surely turn out that quite a lot was known in 2004 about the camps of North Korea. It will turn out that information collected by various human rights groups, South Korean churches, oddball journalists and spies added up to a damning and largely accurate picture of an evil regime. It will also turn out that there were things that could have been done, approaches the South Korean government might have made, diplomatic channels the U.S. government might have opened, pressure the Chinese might have applied. Historians in Asia, Europe and here will finger various institutions, just as we do now, and demand they justify their past actions. And no one will be able to understand how it was possible that we knew of the existence of the gas chambers but failed to act.As Mark Twain (may have) said, "The past may not repeat itself, but it sure does rhyme".
Posted
2/4/2004 12:57:18 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/4/2004 12:53:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/4/2004 12:49:32 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/4/2004 12:10:08 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Each of the major Democratic candidates say they are against gay marriage. They are all, I believe, against a Federal Marriage Amendment. Fine, so am I. But what exactly will Democrats do to oppose gay marriage? As I've noted before -- when Dean was the frontrunner -- none of these guys seem willing to do anything to back up their positions. They want the courts to simply take the issue away from them while they insist they are firm on the issue. Dean was the most cynical and dishonest on the subject. But I can't see how Kerry's much better. There might still be room for Bush to get on the right side of the issue politically if he can force Democrats to answer the question "Would you do anything to stop gay marriage?"To say the least, it will be very interesting to watch all this play out, and to watch Kerry and the remaining Democratic presidential candidates tap-dance. UPDATE: Stephen Green adds: I'm all for gay marriage, as I'm sure readers here know. But the Massachusetts Supremes just handed Bush a wedge issue which could very well set back the gay marriage movement. It's tough for the law to jump ahead of the culture without creating Roe v Wade-type endless rancor -- especially when it tries to do so by judicial fiat. And culturally, I'm afraid, we might not be ready for nation-wide gay marriage. The best hope is that the national Supreme Court stays the hell out of this one, and lets the issue evolve -- and progress -- more naturally.ANOTHER UPDATE: Looks like the slippery slope is getting slipperier up there. I blame Chuck Woolery. Tuesday, February 03, 2004
Posted
2/3/2004 11:24:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 08:38:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 08:30:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
It's really no contest anymore -- not the race among the Democratic presidential candidates but the battle for cable news ratings supremacy. Fox News Channel continues to crush CNN and MSNBC in the political season. The latest available Nielsen Media Research numbers, for the week of Jan. 19-25, show the "Fair and Balanced" network averaging 1.8 million viewers in prime time to rank seventh among all cable networks. CNN had 906,000 viewers during the same period and MSNBC just 363,000. The week included the Iowa caucuses and President Bush's State of the Union address, both of which received substantial attention on all three cable news networks. CNN must be wondering what hit it after making another major investment in political coverage. The granddaddy of cable news has fallen and can't seem to get up. Fox's recent hiring of respected Chris Wallace from ABC News is another blow.Bark quotes Wolf Blitzer of CNN as saying, "If you're distorting, or if you're tilting towards one side, believe me, that will come through very, very quickly. And you'll be slapped very quickly, as you should be." Maybe this is what Blitzer was referring to.
Posted
2/3/2004 08:09:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 07:37:10 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 07:26:53 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Bush's fiscal legacy is expanding Medicare, just as his father's regulatory legacy was the Americans With Disabilities Act. It's amazing how much damage those Bushes can do by being nice.There's a lot about both men to be admired, but fiscal and governmental restraint, unfortunately, isn't one of their best traits.
Posted
2/3/2004 06:52:04 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 03:58:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 03:46:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
CHUTZPAH: Did John Kerry, husband of Teresa Heinz, widowed heir to the Heinz Ketchup fortune, really say he was going to take a stand against "the economy of special privilege"?Flashforward to the next issue of Time Magazine, due out on February 9th: "As Kerry rails about 'George Bush and his economy of privilege,' his wife flies across the country in a ketchup-red-and-white jet sporting '57' as part of its tail number.EdDriscoll.com: taking tomorrow's gratuitous shots, today.
Posted
2/3/2004 03:19:07 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 02:45:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 01:13:29 PM
by Edward Driscoll
There are certain core constituencies that any political party must avoid offending at almost any cost. The Democrats have more of them than the Republicans. They include blacks, activist women and public sector unions, for example — which is why none of the Democratic candidates will so much as hint that he might have doubts about affirmative action or abortion or opposing educational vouchers. One of these Democratic constituencies is the anti-war left, those whose political consciousness was formed during the Vietnam war. Sometimes called the "Blame America First" crowd, they are as implacable and as necessary as any of the other Democrat constituencies, and they are by nature deeply suspicious not only of the Pentagon and the projection of American power abroad but of all forms of behavior that they would describe as "militaristic."Read the whole thing.
Posted
2/3/2004 12:58:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 12:37:18 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 12:04:13 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 11:09:29 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 10:21:10 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 10:15:10 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 02:11:52 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 01:52:05 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/3/2004 01:09:32 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Monday, February 02, 2004
Posted
2/2/2004 11:44:08 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/2/2004 11:28:10 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Howard Dean, a physician and a Democratic presidential candidate, on Monday dismissed as 'silly' a government inquiry into whether indecency rules were broken during the broadcast of the Super Bowl halftime show when pop diva Janet Jackson's bodice was ripped to expose her right breast. 'I find that to be a bit of a flap about nothing,' the former Vermont governor said. 'I'm probably affected in some ways by the fact that I'm a doctor, so it's not exactly an unusual phenomenon for me.'Setting aside the fact that Dean apparently doesn't understand that some people (such as impressionable young kids) aren't doctors and aren't used to seeing exposed, pierced nipples on TV everyday (not to mention women having their clothes ripped off by men in 50,000 seat stadiums), this is in direct contradiction to Dean's remarks near the start of the football season. Back on October 1st, Dean said: ESPN should terminate Limbaugh's contract immediately, and send the message to its viewers and the nation that it holds commentators to the highest standard.So questioning the biases of the media is grounds for being fired, but exposing nipples is silly. And Dean has no problem demanding that one TV network fire someone whose views he disagrees with, but thinks that the FCC has no business investigating another. And having "the highest standard" is important sometimes, but standards are unimportant other times. OK. Glad we cleared that up! UPDATE: John Hawkins also has some thoughts on Dean and Janet. ANOTHER UPDATE: So does Tim Graham.
Posted
2/2/2004 07:04:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
CBS has told so many howlers over the past 18 months that any claim to dignity — and righteous indignation — by this network is now open to snickering. CBS insisted there was no quid pro quo when it sent Pfc. Jessica Lynch a letter suggesting that an exclusive interview with CBS News would be rewarded with other lucrative contracts within the Viacom empire. CBS insisted that its decision to cancel the mini-series "The Reagans" had nothing to do with the right-wing lobbying campaign that threatened a boycott of advertisers' products. And the network insisted that it did not sweeten a deal with Michael Jackson to secure a "60 Minutes" interview with him after his arrest last November as the network was preparing a Michael Jackson entertainment special. Implausible deniability and the fungible walls between news and entertainment, and between art and commerce, exist at every major network. But like a high school student caught smoking pot by the principal, CBS can hardly wriggle free by arguing that everybody does it.Of course, from Walter Duranty to Jayson Blair, the Times itself is hardly pure and innocent themselves when it comes to lying.
Posted
2/2/2004 06:54:42 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/2/2004 06:37:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/2/2004 04:54:08 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/2/2004 04:18:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Apparently Justin Timberlake, former suitor of the philosopher and mathematician Britney Spears, was doing a duet with Janet Jackson. She was dressed in what appeared to be formalwear for zombie morticians -- that wretched leather S&M chic we have come to expect from our "edgy" artists. Mr. Timberlake was dressed like a slob, of course -- he's the sort of modern male who, when called upon to knot a tie, digs through his stack of Maxims looking for an article titled "What to Do If You Gotta Hit a Funeral." At the end of the song, Jackson sang "make me naked" -- and why not? It wouldn't be a halftime show without a joyless mechanical bump & grind masquerading as sensuality, set to a grim tuneless squall of sound masquerading as music. And yes, I am now officially in Coot Mode. Whatever happened to the good old halftime shows, when Up With People would come out and sing about Ice Cream Socials and saving kittens that fell down a well? What happened to America? But I ramble. Point is, Janet -- "Miss Jackson," if you're nasty -- unholstered 50 percent of her bosom, and now the nation is debating whether it was intentional or an accident, and whether Super Bowls of the future will feature enthusiastic deployment of previously shielded body parts. Oy.Indeed. (Or "Exactly". Or "Heh", or whatever hep phrase all us cool coots use these days, daddy-o.)
Posted
2/2/2004 04:01:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
I don't know why left-wingers and the media establishment harbor such antipathy toward SUVs, but I suspect it may be because SUVs are a vehicle much favored by those of us who hunt and fish. Anyone who hunts or fishes must be an insensitive brute, and since the left-wingers long battle to take our guns away has failed to yield results, now they're going after our wheels. When I started out in the news business nearly 45 years ago, advocacy by editorial writers and columnists was acceptable, but a strong effort was made to keep the news columns free of tilt or bias. But even back then the principle of impartiality was beginning to erode, and nowadays it's reached the point where there's scarcely any pretense of maintaining fairness and objectivity. In fact, practically any day of the week I can scan the news wires and find multiple examples of downright falsehoods being foisted off on the public to make a point. What I don't know is whether the falsehoods are deliberate or simply a product of the ignorance of the writers and the editors who foster them. It doesn't make much difference, though, in terms of the impact on readers who are savvy enough to know when they're being lied to.Branham writes that "It's no wonder journalists now rank below lawyers and used-car salesmen in the eyes of the public". And it's no wonder so many Blogs have sprouted up to call them on their lies.
Posted
2/2/2004 03:54:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/2/2004 03:31:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/2/2004 03:23:46 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/2/2004 03:06:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/2/2004 01:57:54 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/2/2004 01:34:00 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/2/2004 12:46:27 PM
by Edward Driscoll
This morning on CNN I caught Jack Cafferty (who's great by my lights) reading viewer email on the whole thing. One viewer gave the hackneyed "we all have body parts, get over it" defense. I haven't had time to scan the blogosphere, but I am sure there are already plenty of people having a good laugh at the "prudes" who took offense to Jackson's display. But here's the thing. Shocking the sensibilities of the bourgeoisie is so old. The people who thought Janet's boob-watch moment was a good idea -- beforehand or afterwards -- almost surely didn't actually enjoy the spectacle themselves. What appeals to them is the idea of shocking other people. Clearly, they weren't shocked -- enjoyably or otherwise -- by seeing Janet's tassledness. They're used to such displays. No, what was cool about it was that it would offend the sensibilities of fuddy-duddies. This sort of thing is the source of a vast, vast amount of bad "art," music, fiction etc. The value of a song or a video is measured not by its creativity or excellence, but by its ability to elicit the desired response from the other side. This sort of thing is so unimpressive. It's tired, it's played-out, it's Madonna. So I'm fine with being might peeved with CBS. But let's not forget to mention that part of their mistake was being predictably banal.And then lying about it afterwards. Heck, Orson Welles did that, in 1938, when he held a press conference after his radio broadcast of the War of the Worlds terrified a nation. His mouth virtually melting butter, he cooed to reporters that he had no idea of what would happen during the broadcast. He merely set out to tell an entertaining story! (I think there's a clip of Welles' performance--surely his best bit of acting, ever--in the Citizen Kane DVD.) But then MTV is played out. It used to be fun in the mid-80s, back when it actually showed videos. If you've got VH-1 Classics on your cable or satellite system, you can actually see how tame much of those videos from the mid-80s were, and often how much fun. Then, perhaps with Madonna's success in mind, MTV decided it needed to shock--really shock--people. Instead, ultimately, it merely anesthezied them. And once Madonna released her Sex book, shocking the masses was pretty much passe, anyhow. I'm not a puritan--but there's plenty of sex available already in popular culture. Heck, just turn to the #500 and #600 blocks of DirecTV channels at around 11:00 PM on a weekend, and it's positively awash in "bare flesh, rouged areolae, moistened crevices, and stiffened giblets", as Tom Wolfe once wrote. And ironically, there were plenty of puritans buying advertising space on the Super Bowl, as the second half was filled with interminable ads begging teenagers and young adults not to smoke, not to do drugs, not to drink and drive, not to buy booze if they're underage, and heck, CBS turned PETA down for their ad about not eating meat. In a way, this is the final triumph of the XFL. While Rod Smart, a.k.a "He Hate Me", arguably the most famous player of the flash-in-the-pan wrestling-cum-football league played a minor role in yesterday's game as a fairly anonymous kick returner for the Panthers, the standards of his old league became--at least for the post-season--the standards of the NFL and the TV networks that made it an enormous success.
Posted
2/2/2004 10:57:14 AM
by Edward Driscoll
An exciting game -- by Super Bowl standards -- between the New England Patriots and the Carolina Panthers was upstaged not only by its halftime show but also by the "edgy" and often crude humor of the commercials. Over the years -- partly because of the huge expense involved -- Super Bowl commercials have become widely ballyhooed events in themselves, and this year some sponsors, paying up to $2.9 million for a 30-second spot, went the smut route in order to stand out in the crowd. Early in the evening, a supposedly hilarious beer commercial featured a dog that was trained to bite men in the crotch and hold on. The man being bitten moaned and grimaced in pain and finally surrendered his can of Bud Light. As it happened, Bud Light set the standards for tastelessness and self-congratulatory humor. A later commercial, stealing a joke from a classic episode of the sitcom "Seinfeld," involved a flatulent horse. The animal, tied to a carriage, emitted an outburst from beneath its tail that caused a candle to burst into flame and burn the hair of the woman holding it. A loud sound effect made it clear that the horse was suffering digestive distress. Many of the other Super Bowl commercials seemed conspicuously inappropriate for an event that is a national rite and the kind of rare TV attraction that brings families together in front of the set. CBS chose to air a spot advertising the upcoming horror movie "Van Helsing" even though it contained extremely disturbing and graphic images of brutality and gore and despite the fact that it has yet to be rated by the Motion Picture Association of America. If the film were eventually to be rated NC-17, it would be contrary to network policy to carry any commercials for it. Based on excerpts shown, "Van Helsing" will earn an R, or Restricted, rating, meaning the film is considered suitable for those under 17 only if they are accompanied by a parent or other adult. The ad was wall-to-wall with monsters baring fangs and implied horrific violence. The negative vibes given off by so many off-color or violent commercials put a soggy cloud over what was supposed to be an evening of wholesome fun. Some of the spots were funny; Jessica Simpson and the Muppets had a high time in their commercial for Pizza Hut, and Homer Simpson starred in a funny spot. But the ghastly output from Bud Light included a commercial in which a chimpanzee talked to a beautiful girl as they sat together on a couch while she waited for her date to return from the kitchen. The monkey made a pass at the girl and asked, "So, how do you feel about back hair?" There was also an excess of commercials for drugs designed to help men suffering from erectile dysfunction.I think this Super Bowl set a trio of firsts: first use of the world "erection" (spoken by the narrator--James Naughton, I think--in the Cialis ad), first commercial with flatulence, and first nipple. Naughton was the actor in the mid-70s TV series version of Planet of the Apes, and as Charlton Heston would say, yesterday's Super Bowl was a madhouse. A maaaaadhouse. Or, maybe it wasn't. Oddly enough, I never saw Janet's boob, and apparently, neither did the twenty or so other people watching the game at my house. By the end of the Super Bowl halftime show, my wife was serving sliced ham and noodle koogle to our guests, who were getting ready to settle back in for the second half, and I was bopping between the kitchen and the den. During the first five minutes of the halftime show, I was progressively turning the sound lower, as nobody here seemed to care about Janet Jackson, Kid Rock, Justin Whathisname and the rest of the halftime performers. I had my PC on during the game, but mostly to have Yahoo's NFL coverage loaded. It was only when I clicked over to the Drudge Report after the game that I saw the photo of Janet and her boob. (And fortunately so, it seems: Janet's nipple apparently completely ruined the game for Stephen Green. Well, maybe not completely...) More thoughts later. Sunday, February 01, 2004
Posted
2/1/2004 02:17:59 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/1/2004 02:02:12 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/1/2004 01:33:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/1/2004 01:28:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/1/2004 01:21:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
This traditional stampede takes place year after year, and seems to kill more Muslims each time. Saudi officials invariably respond with a shrug and a hat tip to Allah. They know it’s going to happen, set up the conditions for it to happen, and make no effective attempt to stop it. What we’re seeing is a form of human sacrifice.But Johnson adds, "who are we to judge the traditions of other cultures? Just last Christmas, Betty Jo Biolovsky tore a fingernail while battling for the last scrap of potato salad at a church social in Peoria. Isn’t that really the same thing?" Heh. Be sure to read the summary of hajj death tolls that one of Johnson's readers compiled.
Home |