| EdDriscoll.com |
|
Saturday, February 14, 2004
Posted
2/14/2004 04:33:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/14/2004 04:12:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/14/2004 02:41:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/14/2004 02:06:43 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/14/2004 02:16:07 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Friday, February 13, 2004
Posted
2/13/2004 10:42:03 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/13/2004 09:38:31 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/13/2004 01:47:46 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/13/2004 01:26:01 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/13/2004 01:10:47 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday, February 12, 2004
Posted
2/12/2004 10:10:16 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/12/2004 08:56:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/12/2004 08:30:07 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Scheindlin wouldn't even waste time and taxpayers' money on a full trial. She all but laughed at what a blatant violation of antitrust laws the NFL draft policy is and all but told the NFL to forget about appealing because it had no chance. Maybe I'm as ``screwy'' as Scheindlin, but that's what I've written for 30 years. Forcing gifted football players to risk their bodies and NFL earning power playing college football without pay has for decades been the biggest injustice in sports. How this system has beaten the legal system this long has been even more extraordinary than 41-year-old Jerry Rice's longevity. What an un-American racket pro and college football have gotten away with since pro football became America's favorite game. All it took to bring it crashing down was one kid just screwy enough to challenge it in court. It doesn't take a judge or lawyer to see that it should have no chance on appeal. All you need to know is that baseball has always drafted players out of high school and that in 1971 Spencer Haywood opened the legal door for high school players to enter the NBA draft. But until now no teenager has dared to take on the NFL in court and to risk becoming a marked man on campus, on draft day and on an NFL field. So the NFL has long benefited from a sensational minor league system for which it pays not a penny. What better way to prepare a young man for pro football than by having him play in nationally televised college games before huge crowds against the country's best young players? And what a sweet deal for the NCAA, which can make hundreds of millions in TV revenue while merely having to feed and house its stars. For pro and college football it has been: I'll fill your vault if you'll fill mine. The lone losers were the 18- to 21-year-old players who wrecked knees or necks for Dear Old U. Many aren't quite physically mature enough for the NFL. Yet many ruin their pro careers, or at least take years off them, while being forced to play the equally violent game of college football.Just as last season began with the Lions' controversial hiring of Steve Mariucci as head coach, it looks like this year's football season is starting early as well----and just as controversially.
Posted
2/12/2004 08:06:59 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/12/2004 08:00:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/12/2004 03:24:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Did you ever read the John Cheever story, The Swimmer, or see the 1968 movie version, which starred a surprisingly buff Burt Lancaster as a middle-aged man reliving his life by swimming from pool to pool on a hot Sunday afternoon in his suburban neighborhood? If you didn't, I'm not surprised, but it's one of those offbeat 1960s films that Bravo reruns from time to time (the other is the Canadian film version of The Fox, with Keir Dullea, minus Gary Lockwood and HAL 9000). [Since this post was written, it's been released on DVD, hence the Amazon link to the right.] I did my own version of The Swimmer today, and I didn't even get wet. As part of our remodeling project, my wife and I are planning to put in a tub-sized Jacuzzi when we renovate our primary bathroom. Because at 6'2", I'm several inches taller than my wife, and 2/3rds of it are legs, I must have sat in 25 different models in a showroom in Fremont, California today. We think we've found a couple of winners, but we'll need to consult with our plumber. By the way, is this a great country, or what? Anyone making a middle class income can walk into a warehouse-sized operation filled with a hundred or so Jacuzzis, hot tubs, just plain tubs, and showers, and purchase whichever one strikes his fancy. Try doing that in Iraq, Afghanistan, China, or Cuba.If you're still with me, here are a couple of shots of the Jacuzzi. Click on them to enlarge.
Posted
2/12/2004 03:00:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/12/2004 02:55:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
I don’t care what John Kerry said when he was 25. I care about what John Kerry says today . . . about what he said when he was 25.Exactly.
Posted
2/12/2004 02:42:34 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/12/2004 01:39:55 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/12/2004 01:36:21 PM
by Edward Driscoll
"I don't think I could have coped so well" with a mate's philandering as Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) has. "I used to say to my husband, my late husband, 'If you ever get something I'll maim you. Not kill you, just maim you.' And we'd laugh, laugh, laugh." Heinz adds that she has never had any reason to suspect either of her husbands. "Not for one day, because what I expect of them, they have a right to expect of me. Maybe I'm into 18-year-olds." At which Heinz's campaign handler, former political journalist Chris Black, cautioned bleakly: "That was a joke."As Roger L. Simon wrote today, "If [italics and bold mine] it proves out that Kerry could not keep it in his pants in the Post Monica Era, in all probability a strong part of him didn't want the job". UPDATE: These guys are probably bummed about today's events.
Posted
2/12/2004 01:14:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/12/2004 01:09:40 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/12/2004 12:46:34 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/12/2004 12:23:25 AM
by Edward Driscoll
A complacent Saddam Hussein was so convinced that war would be averted or that America would mount only a limited bombing campaign that he deployed the Iraqi military to crush domestic uprisings rather than defend against a ground invasion, according to a classified log of interrogations of captured Iraqi leaders and former officers.Wouldn't be the first time Saddam fought the last war. UPDATE: Orrin Judd, ever the contrarian, writes, "Glancing around the Web and twisting the radio knob you'll see and hear folks saying that this shows how badly Saddam misjudged us. In fact, his judgment was entirely sound as regards nearly everyone in the West, except for George W. Bush. No wonder though that the President's radical departure from our previous pusillanimity is paying such dividends from Libya to Pakistan."
Posted
2/12/2004 12:20:25 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Those who know what they owe to the military, and those who don't. I am in the former category, perhaps because I married into a family of Marines and have heard a more than a few stories of sacrifice and loss. Bloggers who presume to play in these fields should be careful to note where they stand. Feel free to question the president's statements and policies, as I do Kerry's, but it would be wise to leave off on questioning the president's service if you haven't, as they saying goes, walked the walk.Makes a nice counterbalance to the "chickenhawk" argument, as well. Wednesday, February 11, 2004
Posted
2/11/2004 09:36:05 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 08:26:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 08:12:02 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Sen. John Kerry, in his stump speech inveighs against the "Benedict Arnold CEOs [who] send American jobs overseas." By the way, the Kerry family business, H.J. Heinz Co. of Pittsburgh, operates 22 factories in the United States and 57 in foreign countries. I don't think that Kerry should shut down The Heinz 57, but he might drop the rhetoric and talk about trade responsibly. He should support, not trade's contraction, but its expansion, like George W. Bush, Bill Clinton and every president since Herbert Hoover.I wonder if the words "Smoot-Hawley" mean anything to Kerry. Probably not.
Posted
2/11/2004 08:00:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 07:57:47 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 02:56:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
[Rep. Robert I Wexler, D-Fla] told Powell he considered him to be "the credible voice in the administration." "When you reached the conclusion that Iraq represented a clear and present danger to the United States, that meant a lot to me," Wexler said. "But the facts suggest there was a part of the story that was not true." Powell fielded the assertions calmly, defending the president's judgment and his own. But when [Rep. Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio] contrasted Powell's military experience to Bush's record with the National Guard, saying the president "may have been AWOL" from duty, Powell exploded. "First of all, Mr. Brown, I won't dignify your comments about the president because you don't know what you are talking about," Powell snapped. "I'm sorry I don't know what you mean, Mr. Secretary," Brown replied. "You made reference to the president," Powell shot back. Brown then repeated his understanding that Bush may have been AWOL from guard duty. "Mr. Brown, let's not go there," Powell retorted. "Let's not go there in this hearing. If you want to have a political fight on this matter, that is very controversial, and I think it is being dealt with by the White House, fine, but let's not go there." Powell then went on to defend the Bush administration's assertions on Iraq's pre-war weaponry. "We didn't make it up," Powell said. "It was information that reflected the views of analysts in all the various agencies."Based on Wexler's comments, I guess Condi Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney--or anyone other than Powell--are no longer credible in the eyes of Democratic congressmen. And since when did Democrats get so concerned about avoiding military service? UPDATE: Glenn Reynolds links to the above article, but also includes contact information for the Democratic congressmen mentioned. ANOTHER UPDATE: Timothy Perry writes: "Funny how this has not made the air on the mainstream media since it happened. You would think this would turn into great television, but then again it was someone defending the president instead of smearing him. " Perhaps the Congressmen should heed the advice of a Democratic senator who stood on the floor of the Senate in 1992 and said: What saddens me most is that Democrats, above all those who shared the agonies of that generation, should now be re-fighting the many conflicts of Vietnam in order to win the current political conflict of a presidential primary. We do not need to divide America over who served and how. I have personally always believed that many served in many different ways. Someone who was deeply against the war in 1969 or 1970 may well have served their country with equal passion and patriotism by opposing the war as by fighting in it. Are we now, 20 years or 30 years later, to forget the difficulties of that time, of families that were literally torn apart, of brothers who ceased to talk to brothers, of fathers who disowned their sons, of people who felt compelled to leave the country and forget their own future and turn against the will of their own aspirations?That man? John F. Kerry.
Posted
2/11/2004 02:34:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 02:26:07 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 02:21:31 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 02:19:11 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 02:00:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Why do we somehow think liberals are all for protecting individual rights when as it shows here, they want to control what you eat, what you smoke, what you drive, where you live, how you protect your home and family, how much money you can make and keep, and the most important action, freedom of speech? Once again, Burton shows WHY liberal Democrats are in trouble in California, as Arnold's election shows. The Dems are misguided in their goals, and disconnected from the needs of the public. While we are battling a smothering state budget deficit, Burton is preoccupied with duck liver. The Democrats know how to control every aspect of our lives, but they can't do anything we really need.
Posted
2/11/2004 01:46:21 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 02:38:57 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 01:51:20 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Whatever note of hope there is in the film comes not from a clear affirmation of renewed purpose, but from the negative but potentially liberating judgment that all is not lost, that it is entirely too soon to write off these lives. Lost in Translation offers more than a glimpse of what it might mean for Hollywood to recover a sense of film making as a craft.On the other hand, James Bowman hated it, deriding it as a film too driven by its feelings, and its characters' feelings, to count for much. I can see Bowman's point, and the film's lack of plot causes it to peter out in its final act. But in a year when, (other than the titanic Lord of the Rings films) Hollywood could do little but blow things up and indulge in verbal scatalogy, this little gem of a film is well worth renting, particularly its widescreen DVD, especially if you've got a 16X9 TV set to view its dazzling cinematography.
Posted
2/11/2004 12:31:11 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/11/2004 12:16:33 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Tuesday, February 10, 2004
Posted
2/10/2004 11:21:18 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/10/2004 09:38:39 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/10/2004 04:21:52 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/10/2004 02:40:06 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/10/2004 02:22:14 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/10/2004 01:31:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/10/2004 01:07:57 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/10/2004 12:44:01 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/10/2004 12:31:36 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Monday, February 09, 2004
Posted
2/9/2004 07:35:49 PM
by Edward Driscoll
MTV is played out. It used to be fun in the mid-80s, back when it actually showed videos. If you've got VH-1 Classics on your cable or satellite system, you can actually see how tame much of those videos from the mid-80s were, and often how much fun. Then, perhaps with Madonna's success in mind, MTV decided it needed to shock--really shock--people. Instead, ultimately, it merely anesthezied them. And once Madonna released her Sex book, shocking the masses was pretty much passe, anyhow.I don't grimace a whole lot when I turn on my radio and listen to classic rock, alternative rock, hard rock and new rock stations. And other than the cheese-factor, I don't gnash my teeth when I watch VH-1 Classic. But MTV, which started it all, is seriously past its freshness dating. Which is probably the biggest reason why so many people boycott it today. Just ask that other arbiter of hip youth culture, Bart Simpson. UPDATE: On the other hand, let's not be too hasty here...
Posted
2/9/2004 06:02:41 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/9/2004 05:58:03 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/9/2004 05:24:32 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/9/2004 05:10:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/9/2004 04:44:44 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/9/2004 04:00:24 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/9/2004 03:51:26 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/9/2004 01:24:25 PM
by Edward Driscoll
The president said Iraq's refusal to cooperate with U.N. weapons inspectors presented a threat to the entire world. "Saddam (Hussein) must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons," Clinton said. Operation Desert Fox, a strong, sustained series of attacks, will be carried out over several days by U.S. and British forces, Clinton said. "Earlier today I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces," Clinton said. "Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors," said Clinton. Clinton also stated that, while other countries also had weapons of mass destruction, Hussein is in a different category because he has used such weapons against his own people and against his neighbors.So here's my question to Vice President Gore: Knowing what we now know about Iraq's weakened capacity to make WMDs, does Gore still feel that his boss was "one of our greatest presidents", or does he feel that Clinton, to borrow the language that Power Line used, "betrayed" the United States by ordering a war against Saddam Hussein that had been "preordained and planned before 9-11 ever took place"?
Posted
2/9/2004 01:02:17 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/9/2004 01:59:08 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/9/2004 12:51:30 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Thursday night’s Hardball on MSNBC marked Ronald Reagan’s 93rd birthday with a look at his legacy. ABC’s Sam Donaldson declared: “I think he deserves credit for accelerating the fall of communism.” And CBS’s Bill Plante agreed: “What he did absolutely hastened the end of the Cold War.”Sam Donaldson praising Reagan. Well, I'll be leaving the Internet now; I've seen everything.
Posted
2/9/2004 12:48:03 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Sunday, February 08, 2004
Posted
2/8/2004 09:22:19 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/8/2004 07:18:45 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/8/2004 04:58:37 PM
by Edward Driscoll
On his hospital bed last week, 16-year-old Abid Tanoli sat listless and alone, half of his body covered by burns that all but destroyed both his eyes and left his face horribly disfigured. The teenager talked, with difficulty, of how his life had been destroyed since the fateful day in June 2002 when he refused to have sex with his teacher at a religious school in Pakistan.As one of Johnson's commenters wrote, "I would love to see this story on a major American news program. Of course, I also would love to win the lottery." You'd have better odds with the latter.
Posted
2/8/2004 03:26:01 PM
by Edward Driscoll
this one was circulated to me via the Internet--perhaps you've seen it too: "An officer in the U.S. Naval reserve was attending a conference that included admirals from both the U.S. Navy and the French Navy. At a cocktail reception, he found himself in a small group that included personnel from both navies. The French admiral started complaining that whereas Europeans learned many languages, Americans learned only English. He then asked: 'Why is it that we have to speak English in these conferences rather than you speak French?' Without hesitating, the American admiral replied: 'Maybe it's because the Brits, Canadians, Aussies, and Americans arranged it so you would not have to speak German.' The group became silent." I don't know whether this is true, and I'm not necessarily endorsing the cheek. But it's kind of fun, huh?Qui, monsieur--it certainly is. UPDATE: Speaking of Jay Nordlinger, Michael J. Totten and the folks posting comments to his blog have some thoughts on Nordlinger's latest column as well, specifically on Nordlinger's thoughts regarding the "Free Tibet" movement. I've long thought a better movement would be "Free China"--you'd be getting two for the price of one. Three, if you include Hong Kong. Four, if you include Taiwan. Five if you include... (Try that argument on your favorite leftwinger, if you've got a half hour or so to kill.)
Posted
2/8/2004 03:21:35 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/8/2004 03:16:20 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/8/2004 01:09:23 PM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/8/2004 11:32:47 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/8/2004 11:07:01 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Posted
2/8/2004 10:59:10 AM
by Edward Driscoll
As Howard Dean's presidential campaign tore through the millions it raised last year, nearly a quarter of it went to the company owned in part by his former campaign manager. The campaign paid $7.2 million to Trippi, McMahon and Squier, the Virginia-based consulting and media firm - 23 percent of the $31 million it spent through Dec. 31, according to PoliticalMoneyLine, which tracks political spending. Joe Trippi, one of the company's partners, was Dean's campaign manager for a year - until he was ousted last month and replaced by Roy Neel as chief executive. Dean asked Trippi to stay with the campaign as an adviser, but Trippi quit. Instead of a salary, Trippi's company had been paid a commission of the campaign's television advertising buys - a percentage he and his company's partners said he never knew. "I didn't want to know. I didn't do this for the money," Trippi said. "I was interested in beating [President] Bush. I was interested in building a campaign that could get Howard Dean in position. I'm proud of what I did. Anyone who knows me knows my personal money was never, ever on my mind, and it was nothing that motivated me."If Trippi worked for Enron, the LA Times and their counterparts in Manhattan would be endlessly "flooding the zone" over this story, wouldn't they? UPDATE: Roger L. Simon has similar thoughts.
Posted
2/8/2004 10:33:29 AM
by Edward Driscoll
Home |