OK, this one was too easy. Yesterday, I wrote:

As with President Reagan's death, it will be interesting to see how the media covers a man that few in that field seem to have many kind words for--unlike millions upon millions in their audience.

Be sure to click on the screen shot of a New York Times Web page that was initially posted only missing just one little item...

Update: Ed Morrissey writes:

What an appalling effort on behalf of the so-called Paper of Record. Such laziness on the part of a reporter and editors cannot simply be accidental. It reminds one of the cluelessness of Pauline Kael who exclaimed her disbelief about Nixon's landslide re-election: "No one I know voted for him!" If the New York Times can ever be capable of embarassment, this incident should shame them greatly.

Another Update: Michelle Malkin has numerous further examples in a similar vein.